Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology

Izvestiya of Saratov University.

ISSN 2304-9790 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9013 (Online)


For citation:

Bocharova E. E. Regulatory and Worldview Factors of Various Forms of Social Activity of Young People. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2018, vol. 7, iss. 4, pp. 333-345. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2018-7-4-333-345

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 95)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
316.62

Regulatory and Worldview Factors of Various Forms of Social Activity of Young People

Autors: 
Bocharova Elena E., Saratov State University
Abstract: 

The aim of the research presented in this article is to study the regulative and ideological factors of different forms of social activity among students. The empirical study is carried out on a sample of students (N = 236), including high school students of general secondary schools (N = 118) and university students from Saratov and Saratov Oblast. We used a complex of psychodiagnostical tools to register various forms of social activity and degree of manifestation using a special questionnaire (by I. V. Arendachuk, E. E. Bocharova, A. I. Zagranichniy et al). Ideological beliefs were researched using “World assumptions scale” by R. Janoff-Bulman (adapted by M. A. Padun and A. V. Kotelnikova). In order to research the regulatory sphere the questionnaire “The style of self-regulation of behavior and activity” by V. I. Morosanova was used. Presumably there is a differentiation in correlation between regulatory and ideological factors of actualization of various forms of social activity of students. It is shown that leisure, Internet and Network and educational and developing forms of activities dominate in the structure of social activity among high school students, and socio-economic form of activity dominates among students. The tendency to differentiate regulatory and ideological factors of actualization of various forms of social activity is recorded. As a result, in the sample of high school students, characterized by the accentuated profile of self-regulation (the stable style in estimation of results), the regulatory factors prevail in actualization of educational and developing, Internet and Network, leisure, altruistic, radical and protest, protest, subcultural and socio-economical forms of activities. In the sample of students characterized by the autonomous style of planning and control, stability of ideological factors of actualization of civil, social and political, altruistic forms of activity and limitations of subcultural activities prevail. The applied aspect of the problem investigated can be realized in the development of programs of youth policy

Reference: 

1. Shamionov R. M., Grigorieva M. V. Psikhologiya sotsial’noy aktivnosti molodezhi: problemy i riski [Psychology of social activity of youth: problems and risks]. Saratov, 2012. 384 p. (in Russian).

2. Bocharova E. E. Granitsy sotsial’noy aktivnosti i sub”yektivnoye blagopoluchiye molodezhi [Frontiers of social activity and subjective well-being of youth]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya Psikhologicheskiye nauki [Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Psychology], 2012, no. 3, pp. 5–11 (in Russian).

3. Trotsuk I. V., Sokhadze K. G. Sotsial’naya aktivnost’ molodezhi: podkhody k otsenke form, motivov i faktorov proyavleniya v sovremennom rossiyskom obshchestve [Social activity of the youth: approaches to the assessment of forms, motives and factors]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Sotsiologiya [RUDN Journal of Sociology], 2014. no. 4, pp. 58–74 (in Russian).

4. Levshina A. A., Lunin S. L. Obshchestvennaya deyatel’nost’ molodezhi: motivy uchastiya [Public Activities of Youth: Participation Motives]. Rossiyskiy psikhol. zhurn. [Russian Psychological Journal], 2015, vol. 12, iss. 2, pp. 55–65 (in Russian).

5. Bocharova E. E. Strukturno-soderzhatel’nyye kharakteristiki samoregulyatsii sotsial’nogo povedeniya lichnosti predstaviteley raznykh etnogrupp [Structural and substantial characteristics self-control of social behavior of representatives different ethno-groups]. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Filosofi ya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika, 2015, vol. 15, iss. 1, pp. 84–88 (in Russian).

6. Arendachuk I. V. Dinamika tsennostno-smyslovykh kharakteristik sotsial’noy aktivnosti sovremennoy molodezhi [Dynamics of value and meaning characteristics of modern youth’s social activity]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Psikhologiya i pedagogika [RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics], 2018, no. 3, pp. 287–307 (in Russian).

7. Lomov B. F. Lichnost’ v sisteme obshchestvennykh otnosheniy [Personality in the system of social relations]. Psikhol. zhurn. [Psychological Journal], 1981, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 3–13 (in Russian).

8. Krupnov A. I. Psikhologicheskiye problemy issledovaniya aktivnosti cheloveka [Psychological problems of research of human activity]. Vopr. psikhol. [Voprosy Psychologii], 1984, no. 3, pp. 25–32 (in Russian).

9. Petrovskiy V. A. Lichnost’ v psikhologii: paradigma sub’yektnosti [Personality in psychology: the paradigm of subjectivity]. Rostov-on-Don, 1996. 512 p. (in Russian).

10. Demin A. N. O granitse preobrazovatel’noy aktivnosti sub”yekta [About the boundary of the subject’s transformative activity]. In: Sub’yektnyy podkhod v psikhologii. Pod red. A. L. Zhuravleva, V. V. Znakova, Z. I. Ryabikinoy, E. A. Sergiyenko (The subjective approach in psychology. Eds. by A. L. Zhuravlev, V. V. Znakov, Z. I. Ryabikina, E. A. Sergiyenko). Moscow, 2009, pp. 107–120 (in Russian).

11. Kogan V. Z. Obshchestvennaya aktivnost’ lichnosti kak sotsial’no-psikhologicheskaya problema: avtoref. dis. … kand. psikhol. nauk [Public activity of the personality as a socio-psychological problem: Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Psychol.). Moscow, 1970. 22 p. (in Russian).

12. Zhuravlev A. L., Kupreychenko A. B. Ekonomicheskoe samoopredelenie: teoriya i empiricheskie issledovania [Economic self-determination: theory and empirical research]. Moscow, 2007. 480 p. (in Russian).

13. Kupreychenko A. B. Problema opredeleniya i otsenki sotsial’noy aktivnosti [The problem of defi ning and evaluating social activity]. Psikhologiya individual’nosti. Materialy IV Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii [Psychology of individuality. Materials of the IV All-Russian Scientifi c Conference]. Moscow, 2012, pp. 181–182 (in Russian).

14. Shamionov R. M. Socializaciya lichnosti: sistemnodiahronicheskiy podhod [Socialization of personality: systematic-diachronic approach]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya, 2013, vol. 6, no. 27, p. 8. Available at: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2013v6n27/782-shamionov27.html (accessed: 13 May 2018) (in Russian).

15. Bocharova E. E. Sovremennyye trendy soderzhatel’nykh metodov analiza protsessa sotsializatsii lichnosti [Contemporary trends of meaningful methods of the person`s socialization process` analysis]. Sovremennyye issledovaniya sotsial’nykh problem [Modern Research of Social Problems], 2013, no. 9, p. 58. Available at: http://sisp.nkras.ru/e-ru/issues/2013/9/bocharova.pdf (accessed: 13 May 2018) (in Russian). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12731/2218-7405-2013-9-59

16. Maksimova N. E., Aleksandrov I. O., Tikhomirova I. V., Filippova E. V., Fomitcheva L. F. Struktura i aktualgenez sub’ekta s pozitsiy sistemno-evolyutsionnogo podhoda [Structure and genesis concurrent with actualization of the subject as the systemic evolutionary approach views them]. Psikhol. zhurn. [Psychological Journal], 2004, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 17–40 (in Russian).

17. Bondarenko I. N., Morosanova V. I., Drapkin I. S., Putko N. A. Aktualgenez osoznannoy samoregulyatsii v situatsii vybora urovnya slozhnosti uchebnykh zadaniy [Actual-genesis of conscious self-regulation in the situation of choice of the educational tasks complexity level]. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology], 2014, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 64–81 (in Russian).

18. Konopkin O. A. Psikhologicheskie mekhanizmy regulyatsii deyatel’nosti [Psychological mechanisms of activity regulation]. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2011. 320 p. (in Russian).

19. Morosanova V. I. Samoregulyatsiya i individual’nost’ cheloveka [Self-regulation and human individuality]. Moscow, 2010. 519 p. (in Russian).

20. Leontiev D. A. Mirovozzreniye kak mif i mirovozzreniye kak deyatel’nost’ [Worldview as a myth and world view as an activity]. Tomsk, 2004. 319 p. (in Russian).

21. Molchanova E. V., Serdyuk I. I. Mirovozzrencheskaya aktivnost’ lichnosti: osmysleniye i issledovaniye [Ideological activity of the individual: a refl ection and study]. Sovremennyye issledovaniya sotsial’nykh problem [Modern Research of Social Problems], 2016, no. 8, pp. 143–152. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mirovozzrencheskayaaktivnost-lichnosti... (accessed 13.05.2018) (in Russian).

22. Zalesskiy G. E. Psikhologiya mirovozzreniya i ubezhdeniy lichnosti [Psychology of the world outlook and beliefs of the person]. Moscow, 1994. 138 p. (in Russian).

23. Padun M. A., Kotel’nikova A. V. Modifi katsiya metodiki issledovaniya bazisnykh ubezhdeniy lichnosti R. Yanoff-Bul’man [Personal basic beliefs research method of R. Janoff-Bulman]. Psikhol. zhurn. [Psychological Journal], 2008, no. 4, pp. 98–106 (in Russian).

24. Morosanova V. I. Individual’nyy stil’ samoregulyatsii: fenomen, struktura i funktsii v proizvol’noy aktivnosti cheloveka [Individual style of self-regulation: a phenomenon, structure and functions in the arbitrary activity of a person]. Moscow, 1998. 184 p. (in Russian).

25. Padun M. A., Kotel’nikova A. V. Psihicheskaya travma i kartina mira. Teoriya, empiriya, praktika [Mental trauma and the picture of the world. Theory, empirics, practice]. Moscow, 2012. 206 p. (in Russian).

26. Bocharova E. E. Soderzhatel’nyye kharakteristiki «predmetnogo polya» diskriminatsionnykh ustanovok [Content Characteristics of the «Subject Field» of Discriminatory Attitudes]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Psikhologiya i pedagogika [RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics], 2018, no. 3, pp. 308–320 (in Russian).

Published: 
25.12.2018