Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology

Izvestiya of Saratov University.

ISSN 2304-9790 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9013 (Online)


For citation:

Ryaguzova E. V. Interpersonal rejection as a special type of relationship in the ontological constant ‘Me and the Other’. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2023, vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 24-33. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2023-12-1-24-33, EDN: ULMUDT

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 169)
Полный текст в формате PDF(En):
(downloads: 246)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
159.9:316.47
EDN: 
ULMUDT

Interpersonal rejection as a special type of relationship in the ontological constant ‘Me and the Other’

Autors: 
Ryaguzova Elena V., Saratov State University
Abstract: 

The article is devoted to interpersonal rejection that is caused by breaking off the relations in the dyad ‘Me and the Other’. The scientifi c interest is focused purely on ostracism. It is associated with ignoring and excluding a group representative from the general communicative and role-based team network as a retaliatory measure or group punishment. The study proposes the triangle of interpersonal rejection subjects. This triangle includes the one who rejects, the one who is rejected, and the one who witnesses the ostracism episode. In accordance with this idea, the author considers the stage theory of ostracism by K. Williams. The theory focuses on the frustration of the needs of a person who has been ostracized and possible consequences of the rejection. The study also presents a universal model by L. Richman and M. Leary, which is based on the development of various motivational tracks depending on the subjective interpretation of a negative interpersonal episode. The model explains the immediate and long-term consequences of this negative experience. Further on, the study provides the analysis of the Responsive Theory of Social Exclusion by G. Freedman, K. D. Williams, J. S. Beer, which focuses on the interactive nature of social exclusion and involves the study of both interacting parties: of those who exclude and of those who are excluded. The paper describes the theory of S. Rudert and R. Greifeneder, which is focused on the third side of the rejection episode, i.e. on the observer, whose action or inaction determines the consequences of interpersonal rejection. The applied aspect of the problem under study consists in the possibility to use the results of theoretical refl ection in the educational process. Moreover, it can help to develop preventive measures in order to avert antisocial behavior and to develop psychotherapeutic intervention programs and psychological support programs for the subjects of the rejection.

Reference: 
  1. Cascio J. Facing the Age of Chaos. URL: https://medium. com/@cascio/facing-the-age-of-chaos-b00687b1f51d (дата обращения: 28.10.2022).
  2. Иоселиани А. Д., Цхададзе Н. В. Эпоха перемен – новый этап отчуждения // Вестник экономической безопасности. 2019. № 2. С. 368‒373. https://doi.org/10.24411/2414-3995-2019-10124
  3. Williams K. D. Ostracism // Annual Review of Psychology. 2007. Vol. 58. P. 425‒452. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641
  4. Williams K. D., Nida S. A. Ostracism: Consequences and coping // Current Direction in Psycological Science. 2011. Vol. 20, iss. 2. P. 71‒75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411402480
  5. Бойкина Е. Э. Остракизм и родственные феномены: обзор зарубежных исследований // Психология и право. 2019. Т. 9, № 3. С. 127–140. https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2019090310
  6. Eisenberger N. I., Lieberman M. D., Williams K. D. Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion // Science. 2003. Vol. 302, iss. 5643. P. 290‒292. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089134
  7. Ciarocco N. J., Sommer K. L., Baumeister R. F. Ostracism and Ego depletion: The strains of silence // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2001. Vol. 27, iss. 9. P. 1156‒1163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201279008 8
  8. Леонтьев Д. А. Трудности репликации и уязвимость опровержения: случай «эффекта истощения эго» // Экспериментальная психология. 2020. Т. 13, № 4. C. 192‒204. https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2020130414
  9. Бойкина Е. Э. Современные лики социального остракизма: гостинг, орбитинг, фаббинг, культура отмены // Современная зарубежная психология. 2022. Т. 11, № 2. С. 131–140. https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2022110212
  10. Субботина М. В. Культура отмены: проявление социальной справедливости или новый инструмент манипуляции // Общество: социология, психология, педагогика. 2022. № 3. С. 34‒37. https://doi.org/10.24158/spp.2022.3.5
  11. Бойкина Е. Э. Социальный остракизм как фактор антисоциального поведения несовершеннолетних: дис. … канд. психол. наук. М., 2021. 237 с.
  12. Richman L. S., Leary M. R. Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: A multimotive model // Psychological Review. 2009. Vol. 116, iss. 2. P. 365‒383. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015250
  13. Sunami N., Nadzan M. A., Jaremka L. M. Does the prospect of fulfi lling belonging affect social responses to rejection? A conceptual replication attempt // Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2019. Vol. 10, iss. 3. P. 307‒316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618762301
  14. Freedman G., Williams K. D., Beer J. S. Softening the blow of social exclusion: The responsive theory of social exclusion // Frontiers in Psychology. Ser. Personality and Social Psychology. 2016. Vol. 7. P. 1570. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01570
  15. Zou Y., Wang Y., Yang X., Jiang R. Observed ostracism and compensatory behavior: A moderated mediation model of empathy and observer justice sensitivity // Personality and Individual Differences. 2022. Vol. 198. Article number 111829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid. 2022.111829
  16. Бойкина Е. Э., Чиркина Р. В. Социальный остракизм: современное состояние проблемы, методология и методы исследования // Психология и право. 2020. Т. 10, № 1. С. 152‒170. https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2020100114
  17. Rudert S. C., Greifeneder R. How observers interpret and respond to ostracism situations // Current Directions in Ostracism, Social Exclusion and Rejection Research / ed. by S. C. Rudert, R. Greifeneder, K. Williams. London : Routledge, 2019. P. 376‒391. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351255912
  18. Rudert S. C., Greifeneder R. Whom to punish? How observers sanction norm-violating behavior in ostracism situations // European Journal of Social Psychology. 2020. Vol. 50, iss. 2. P. 376‒391. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2606
  19. Over H., Carpenter M. Priming third-party ostracism increases affi liative imitation in children // Developmental Science. 2009. Vol. 12, iss. 3. P. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00820.x
  20. Wesselmann E. D., Williams K. D., Hales A. H. Vicarious ostracism // Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2013. Vol. 7, iss. 153. P. 1–2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00153
Received: 
03.11.2022
Accepted: 
15.12.2022
Published: 
31.03.2023
Short text (in English):
(downloads: 74)