Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology

Izvestiya of Saratov University.

ISSN 2304-9790 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9013 (Online)


For citation:

Furmanov I. A. Hostility Attribution and Behavior Patterns with the Children in Agression Provoking Situation. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2014, vol. 3, iss. 3, pp. 267-273. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2014-3-3-267-273

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 18)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
316.622

Hostility Attribution and Behavior Patterns with the Children in Agression Provoking Situation

Autors: 
Furmanov Igor A., Belarusian State University
Abstract: 

The article discusses interrelation between the hostility attribution and behavior scenarios with the children in aggression provoking situation. It has been found that the predominant cognitive styles used by the younger students to explain the reasons for peers’ behavior in aggression provoking situation are non-hostility and chance attribution, and tendency to forgiveness. Primary school students regardless of gender tend to choose the strategy of passive aggression and assertive response. However, it was found that boys often choose active aggression, and girls - escaping/avoiding strategy. Active aggression in provoking situations is chosen when hostility and intention are attributed to an act, or when deciding on the severe punishment to the provocateur. Choice of scenarios of passive aggression and suppressed aggression is made when the peers’ behavior is evaluated as non-hostile, accidental action requiring no punishment. Choice of such scenarios as assertive response, escape, and eliminating the damage is motivated by the peculiarities of hostility attribution process.

Reference: 

1. Crick N. R., Dodge K. A. A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 1994, vol. 115, pp. 74-101 (in English).

2. Dodge K. A. Social cognitions and children’s aggressive behavior. Child Development, 1980, vol. 51, pp. 162-170 (in English).

3. Fontaine R. G. Evaluative behavioral judgments and instrumental antisocial behaviors in children and adolescents. Clinical Psychology Review, 2006, vol. 26, pp. 956-967 (in English).

4. Huesmann L. R. The role of social information processing and cognitive schema in the acquisition and maintenance of habitual aggressive behavior. Human aggression: Theories, research and implications for social policy. San Diego, 1998, pp. 73-109 (in English).

5. McFall R. M. A review and reformulation of the concept of social skills. Behavioral Assessment, 1982, vol. 4, pp. 1-33 (in English).

6. Dodge K. A. A social information processing model of social competence in children. Minnesota symposium on child psychology. Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1986. pp. 77-125 (in English).

7. Crick N. R., Dodge K. A. Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 1996, vol. 67, pp. 993-1002 (in English).

8. Pettit G. S., Mize J. Social-cognitive processes in the development of antisocial and violence behavior. The Cambridge handbook of violent behavior. Eds. by D. J. Flannery, A. T. Vazsonyi, I. Waldman. New York, 2007, pp. 322-343 (in English)

9. Fontaine R. G., Yang C., Burks V. S., Dodge K. A., Price J. M., Pettit G. S. et al. Loneliness as a partial mediator of the relation between low social preference in childhood and anxious/depressed symptoms in adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 2009, vol. 21, pp. 479-491 (in English).

10. Fontaine R. G., Yang C., Dodge K. A., Bates J. E., Pettit G. S. Testing an individual systems model of response evaluation and decision (RED) and antisocial behavior across adolescence. Child Development, 2008, vol. 79, pp. 462-475 (in English).

11. Fontaine R. G., Dodge K. A. Real-time decision making and aggressive behavior in youth: a heuristic model of response evaluation and decision (RED). Aggressive Behavior, 2006, vol. 32, pp. 604-624 (in English).

12. Aber J. L., Brown J. L., Jones S., Samples F. Adapting measures of children’s beliefs, attributions and skills for use in the evaluation of violence prevention projects. New York, 1995 (Unpublished) (in English).

13. Fourmanov I. А. Agressiya i nasilie: diagnostika, profi laktika i korrektsiya (Aggression and violence: diagnostics, preventive maintenance and correction). St.-Petersburg, 2007. 480 p. (in Russian).

14. Fourmanov I. А., Aladin А. А., Ananenko A. A. et al. Obshchenatsional’noe issledovanie po otsenke situatsii s nasiliem v otnoshenii detey v Respublike Belarus’ (National research on a situation assessment with violence concerning children in Republic Belarus), Minsk, 2010. 156 p. (in Russian).

15. Weiner B. An Attributional Theory of Motivation

Published: 
06.10.2014
Short text (in English):
(downloads: 15)