Cite this article as:

Perevozkin S. B., Perevozkina Y. M. Characteristics of the ultimate meanings and students’ life-purpose orientations depending on the gender. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2021, vol. 10, iss. 2, pp. 129-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2021-10-2-129-138


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
UDC: 
159.9.07
Language: 
Russian

Characteristics of the ultimate meanings and students’ life-purpose orientations depending on the gender

Abstract: 

 The relevance of the study is conditioned by rapid transition to digital forms of education, which is associated with the pandemic. Students have changed the way they interact with teachers and with each other, which constantly leads to transformation of personal meanings, values, rethinking of their purpose and role in the educational process. The purpose of the study, presented in the article, is to investigate unusual characteristics of the semantic sphere regarding male and female students’ academic activity. Hypothesis: semantic content of academic activity differs in male and female students. Participants are first-year full-time students, studying at the Faculty of Psychology, Faculty of Engineering and Economics and Faculty of Human Resources Management (N = 102, aged from 18 to 22 years, 52 participants are female students and 50 participants are male students). The participants were tested using Life-Purpose Orientations Test (D. A. Leontiev) and the Ultimate Meanings Technique (D. A. Leontiev). Based on the latter methodology, the entire sample was divided into five groups depending on the presence of a certain meaning. The conjugation of ultimate meanings and gender was determined using φ-Pearson criterion, while MANOVA criterion helped to investigate differences in life-purpose orientations depending on gender and ultimate meanings. We established differentiation within ultimate meanings in education depending on gender of a student: men are focused on respect and safety, while women are focused on getting pleasure and gaining confidence. We found that women connect getting pleasure and gaining confidence while learning with monitoring their lives, whereas male students connect it with the ultimate meanings of security and respect, satisfaction with their own lives and the feeling of being able to influence their life. The obtained results can help to draw the following conclusion: development of the individual system of life-purpose orientations and its functioning in the educational situation are interconnected with gender as one of the most essential biosocial characteristics of an individual.

References
  1. Shamionov R. M. Value-semantic orientations as the basis of the social activity of youth. In: T. A. Nestik, Yu. V. Kovaleva, eds. Sotsial’naya i ekonomicheskaya psikhologiya [Social and economic psychology: in 2 pt. Pt. 2]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Publ., 2018, pp. 423–428 (in Russian).
  2. Martela F., Steger M. F. The three meanings of meaning in life: Distinguishing coherence, purpose, and signifi cance. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2016, vol. 11, iss. 5, pp. 531–545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1137623
  3. Smith J. A. Participants and researchers searching for meaning: Conceptual developments for interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2019, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 166–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1540648
  4. Vess M., Hoeldtke R., Leal S. A., Sanders C. S., Hicks J. A. The subjective quality of episodic future thought and the experience of meaning in life. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2018, vol. 13, iss. 4, pp. 419–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1 080/17439760.2017.1291851
  5. Preuss F., Perevozkina Yu. M. Interconnection and types of social relations of role socialization system formation: Metasystem approach. Sistemnaya psihologiya i sociologiya [Systems Psychology and Sociology], 2020, no. 3 (35), pp. 5–26 (with translation into Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25688/2223–6872.2020.35.3.1
  6. Hadden B. W., Knee C. R. Finding meaning in us: The role of meaning in life in romantic relationships. The Journal of Positive Psycholog, 2018, vol. 13, iss. 3, pp. 226–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1257057
  7. Perevozkina Yu. M., Perevozkin S. B., Dmitrieva N. V. Archetypal determinants of the model of value-role attitudes in marriage. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya [World of Science, Culture, Education], 2015, no. 1 (50), pp. 190–195.
  8. Svintsov I. N. Separate aspects of youth family policy in the context of public administration. Omsk Scientifi c Bulletin, 2007, no. 3 (55), pp. 64–67 (in Russian).
  9. Wissing M. P., Khumalo I. P., Chigeza S. C. Meaning as perceived and experienced by an African student group. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 2014, vol. 24, iss. 1, pp. 92–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2014.904101
  10. Gerardy H., Mounts N. S., Luckner A. E., Valentiner D. P. Mothers Management of Adolescent Peer Relationships: Associations With Aggressive, Prosocial, and Playful Behavior. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 2015, vol. 176, iss. 5, pp. 299–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2015.1066746
  11. Pattakos A., Dundon E. Discovering Meaning Through the Lens of Work. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 2017, vol. 30, iss. 1, pp. 42–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2015.1119084
  12. Mason H. D. Sense of meaning and academic performance: A brief report. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 2017, vol. 27, iss. 3, pp. 282–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2017.1321860
  13. Sullivan N., Freer B. D., Ulrich S. Student veterans and adjustment to college: Making meaning of military experiences. Journal of American College Health, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2019.1683017
  14. Erikson E. H. Ego Development and Historical Change. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 1946, vol. 2, iss. 1, pp. 359–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00797308.1946.11823553
  15. Seryy A. V., Yanitskiy M. S., Brown O. A. Depedence of the student’ self-concept structure on their meaning-of-life orientations. The Herzen University Studies: Psychology in Education, 2020, no. 3, pp 597–607 (in Russian).
  16. Soldatova E. L. Ego-identity in normal developmental crises. Voprosy Psikhologii, 2006, no. 5, pp. 75–84 (in Russian).
  17. Manukyan V. R. Classifi cation and psychological content of crises in the adult period of development. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relation, 2002, no. 6, pp. 20–25 (in Russian).
  18. Leontiev D. A. Meaning making and its contexts: life, structure, culture, experience. The World of Psychology, 2014, no. 1 (77). pp. 104–117 (in Russian).
  19. Tkhostov A. Sh., Surnov K. G. Modern technologies infl uence on personality development and pathological forms of adaptation formation: The back side of socialization. Psychological Journal, 2005, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 16–24 (in Russian).
  20. Mazur E. S., Gelfand V. B., Kachalov P. V. Semantic regulation of negative experiences in earthquake victims in Armenia. Psychological Journal, 1992, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 54–66 (in Russian).
  21. Magomed-Eminov M. Sh. Personality and extreme life situation. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 1983, no. 4, pp. 26–35 (in Russian).
  22. Perevozkina Yu. M., Perevozkin S. B., Panshina L. V. Structure of integrated individuality of management abilities of students training on the direction of Management. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 2017, no. 6, pp. 124–132 (in Russian).
  23. Edwards M. E., Van Tongeren D. R. Meaning mediates the association between suffering and well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2020, vol.15, iss. 6, pp. 722–733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2019.1651890
  24. Huguelet P. Psychiatry and religion: A perspective on meaning. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 2017, vol. 20, iss. 6, pp. 567–572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2017.1377956
  25. Lewis Hall M. E., Shannonhouse L., Aten J., McMartin J., Silverman E. J. Religion-specifi c resources for meaningmaking from suffering: Defi ning the territory. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 2018, vol. 21, iss. 1, pp. 77–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2018.1448770
  26. Kreitler S. The meaning profi les of anxiety and depression: Similarities and differences in two age groups. Cognition and Emotion, 2018, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1499–1513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1311248
  27. Leontiev D. A. Psikhologiya smysla: priroda, stroeniye i dinamika smyslovoy real›nosti [Psychology of Meaning: Nature, Structure and Dynamics of Semantic Reality]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2003. 487 p. ( in Russian).
  28. Dwyer R. J., Dunn E.W., Hershfi eld H. E. Cousins or conjoined twins: How different are meaning and happiness in everyday life? Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2017, vol. 2, iss. 2–3, pp. 199–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2017.1376580
Full text (in Russian):
(downloads: 34)
Short text (in English):
(downloads: 9)