Cite this article as:

Khukhlaev O. E., Tkachenko N. V. Attitude of Russian teachers to cultural diversity in difficult pedagogical situations: Experience of qualitative analysis. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2021, vol. 10, iss. 1, pp. 33-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2021-10-1-33-44


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
UDC: 
316.648.2
Language: 
Russian

Attitude of Russian teachers to cultural diversity in difficult pedagogical situations: Experience of qualitative analysis

Abstract: 

Student-related cultural diversity is a phenomenon that characterizes most Russian schools. Intercultural interaction between teachers and students is discussed in the article from the perspective of the model called “Diversity in Organizations: Perception and Approaches” developed by M. Tatar and G. Gorenchik. The purpose of the study was to investigate the content of the ideas of Russian teachers about cultural diversity in the educational environment in the context of solving difficult pedagogical situations when interacting with children of migrants belonging to different cultures. The hypothesis of the study was the assumption that meaningfully different approaches to understanding cultural diversity in the educational environment constitute the interrelated integrated system of views, and their manifestation is largely related to how a teacher copes with difficult pedagogical situations when working with children belonging to other cultures and their parents. To achieve this goal, we chose the qualitative research method, which allows us to focus on the analysis of the respondent’s personal experience. The study was carried out in the format of in-depth interviews involving 6 teachers, who were females, aged 34 to 55 years, living in Moscow, Voronezh region and the Komi Republic. The interview transcripts were analysed using a phenomenological approach. It was established that Russian teachers used all four approaches to assessing cultural differences: Problem, Challenge, Resource and Indifference. It was shown that within different contexts, in different difficult situations, the same teacher could demonstrate a different attitude towards cultural characteristics of migrants’ children belonging to a foreign culture. It was established that cultural differences were the focus of the teacher’s attention in the situation of their problematization, when they created difficult pedagogical situations in combination with bright external markers of the student’s cultural affiliation. The obtained results allow for more effective development of teachers’ professional practice and promote the perception of cultural diversity as a Challenge and/or Resource.

References
  1. Alexandrov D. A., Ivaniushina V. A., Kazartseva E. V. Ethnic Composition and Migration Status of Primary and Secondary School Students in Russia. Educational Studies, 2015, no. 2, pp. 173–195 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2015-2-173-195
  2. Kuznetsov I. M., Khukhlaev O. E. Risks of Interethnic Confl icts in Educational Institutions of Moscow. Social Psychology and Society, 2014, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 115–126 (in Russian).
  3. Wilson-Daily A. E., Kemmelmeier M., Prats J. Intergroup contact versus confl ict in Catalan high schools: A multilevel analysis of adolescent attitudes toward immigration and diversity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2018, vol. 64, pp. 12–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.03.002
  4. Egorova N. M. Investigation of the correlation of intergroup adaptation and the level of ethnic identity and tolerance in policultural school. Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Series “Psychology”, 2011, no. 1, pp. 135–140 (in Russian).
  5. Il’ina T. B. Podgotovka pedagogov k rabote s det’mimigrantami v dopolnitel’nom professional’nom obrazovanii [Preparing teachers to work with migrant children in additional vocational education]. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Pedag.). Omsk, 2018. 22 p. (in Russian).
  6. Zborovskiy G. E., Shuklina E. A. Teaching children of migrants as a problem of their social adaptation. Sociological Studies, 2013, no. 2 (346), pp. 80–91 (in Russian).
  7. Ereş F. Problems of the Immigrant Students’ Teachers: Are They Ready to Teach? International Education Studies, 2016, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 64–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n7p64
  8. Demintseva E. B., Zelenova D. A., Kosmidis E. A., Oparin D. A. Adaptation of Migrant Children in the Schools of Moscow and Moscow Region. Demographic Review, 2017, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 80–109 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/demreview.v4i4.7529
  9. Kashapov M. M. Teoriya i praktika resheniya pedagogicheskoy situatsii [Theory and Practice of Solving a Pedagogical Situation]. Yaroslavl’, YarGU Publ., 1997. 100 p. (in Russian).
  10. Samokhvalova I. G. Features of difficult pedagogical situations as a psychological problem. In: Vasyagina N. N., Kazaeva E. A., sci. eds. Aktual’nye problemy razvitiya lichnosti: sbornik nauchnyh trudov [Current Problems of Personali ty Development. Collection of Scientific Papers]. Ekaterinburg, Ural’skiy gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskiy universitet Publ., 2016, pp. 129–139 (in Russian).
  11. Bandura A. Self-effi cacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 1977, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 191–215.
  12. Tatar M., Ben-Uri I., Horenczyk G. Assimilation attitudes predict lower immigration-related self-effi cacy among Israeli immigrant teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2011, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 247–255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-010-0044-3
  13. Gutentag T., Horenczyk G., Tatar M. Teachers’ Approaches Toward Cultural Diversity Predict DiversityRelated Burnout and Self-Effi cacy. Journal of Teacher Education, 2018, vol. 69, iss. 4, pp. 408–419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117714244
  14. Horenczyk G., Tatar M. The attitude of teachers to multiculturalism and their perception of the organizational culture of the school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2002, vol. 18, iss. 4, pp. 435–445 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.016/80742-051x(02)00008-2
  15. Horenczyk G., Tatar M. Schools’ organizational views of diversity: Perceptions and approaches. In: S. Vandeyar, ed. Hyphenated Selves: Immigrant Identities Wi thin Education Contexts. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Unisa Press, 2011, pp. 131–148.
  16. Rissanen I., Kuusisto E., Kuusisto A. Developing teachers’ intercultural sensitivity: Case study on a pilot course in Finnish teacher edu cation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2016, vol. 59, pp. 446–456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.018
  17. Alvarez V. I., González M. I. Teachers’ intercultural competence: a requirement or an option in a culturally diverse classroom? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2018, vol. 22, iss. 5, pp. 510–526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1377298
  18. Ulanovsky A. M. Qualitative researches: approaches, strategies, methods. Psychological Journal, 2009, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 18–28 (in Russian).
  19. Kvale S. Issledovatel’skoe interv’yu [Research Interview]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2003. 301 p. (in Russian).
  20. Khukhlaev O. E., Gritsenko V. V., Pavlova O. S., Tkachenko N. V., Usubian Sh. A., Shorokhova V. A. Comprehensive Model of Intercultural Competence: Theoretical Substantiation. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 2020, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 13–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2020-17-1-13-28
  21. Creswell J. W., Poth C. N. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publ., 1997. 450 p.
  22. Starks H., Brown Trinidad S. Choose Your Method: A Comparison of Phenomenology, Discourse Analysis, and Grounded Theory. Qualitative Health Research, 2007, vol. 17, iss. 10, pp. 1372–1380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307307031
  23. Smith J. A., Osborn M. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. In: J. A. Smith, ed. Qualitative Psychology: A Partical Guide to Research Methods. 2nd ed. London, Sage Publ., 2008, pp. 53–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470776278.CH10
  24. Mel'nikova O. T., Krichevec A. N., Gusev A. N., Khoroshilov D. A., Barskiy F. I., Busygina N. P. Criteria for the Evaluation of Qualitative Research. National Psychological Journal, 2014, no. 2 (14), pp. 49–51 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2014.0206
  25. Petrovskiy V. A. Lichnost’ v psikhologii: paradigma sub”ektnosti [Personality in Psychology: The Paradigm of Subjectivity]. Rostov-on-Don, Feniks Publ., 1996. 512 p. (in Russian).
  26. Derkach A. A. Professional subjectivity as a psychoacmeological phenomen (continued). Akmeology, 2016, no. 1 (57), pp. 8–13 (in Russian).
  27. Larskikh M. V. Research of person’s perfectionism in professional activity of teacher. Tambov University Rewiew. Series: Humanities, 2010, vol. 6 (86), pp. 138–140 (in Russian).
  28. Melnichuk A. S. The Emotional burnout and perfectionism among teachers: the specifi c on interrelation. Vestnik Psykhotherapii, 2017, no. 63 (68), pp. 77–94 (in Russian).
  29. Medvedskaya E. I., Sheryagina E. V. Features of Empathy and Professional Burnout of Russian and Belarusian Teachers. Conseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2017, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 59–74 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.201725020430
  30. Magun V., Rudnev M., Schmidt P. A Typology of European Values and Russians’ Basic Human Values. Sociological Research, 2017, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 149–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10610154.2017.1358029
  31. Mukomel’ V. I. Adaptation and i ntegration of migrants: methodological approaches towards assessement of policy effectiveness and the role of the receiving society. In: M. K. Gorshkov, exeсutive ed. Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya: sb. nauch. st. [Reforming Russia. Collection of Scientifi c Articles]. Moscow, Novyi hronograf Publ., 2016, no. 14, pp. 411–467 (in Russian).
  32. Vasilyuk F. E. Dialog Karla Rodzhersa i Martina Bubera [Dialogue between Karl Rogers and Martin Buber]. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 1994, vol. 3, no. 4 (in Russian).
  33. Leytc G. Psikhodrama: teoriya i praktika. Klassicheskaya psikhodrama Ya. L. Moreno [Psychodrama: Theory and Practice. Classical Psychodrama by J. L. Moreno]. (Transl. from German by A. M. Bokovikov). Moscow, KogitoCentr Publ., 2007. 379 p. (in Russian).
Full text (in Russian):
(downloads: 70)
Short text (in English):
(downloads: 7)