Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology

Izvestiya of Saratov University.

ISSN 2304-9790 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9013 (Online)

For citation:

Yanchuk V. A. Socio-Cultural-Interdeterministic Dialogical Perspective of Forming Intercultural Competence. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2014, vol. 3, iss. 3, pp. 241-253. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2014-3-3-241-253

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
download
(downloads: 143)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Psychology of Social Development
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
316
DOI: 
10.18500/2304-9790-2014-3-3-241-253

Socio-Cultural-Interdeterministic Dialogical Perspective of Forming Intercultural Competence

Autors: 
Yanchuk Vladimir A., Academy of Postgraduate Education
Abstract: 

The study shows that socio-cultural-interdeterministic dialogical approach focuses on conditioned interdeterministic nature of interactions between situational, personal, and activity determinants of behavior, which are actualized in concrete historical and cultural context. The article substantiates the necessity of viewing the range of problems of a personality in the three-dimensional continuum of the apprehended-non-apprehended-existential, which allows to cover the diversity of manifestations of psychological phenomenology. Intercultural competence is viewed in the aspect of ability to form separable meanings and emotions based on the acquisition of knowledge regarding uniqueness of language, values and norms, emotions and behavioral algorithms of each other.

Key words: 
dialogue
mutual understanding
imics
interdetermination
integration
intersubjectness
intertextuality
ithics
culture
cultural competence
cultural framing
shareable meanings
Reference: 
  1. Mazilov V.A., Yanchuk V.A., Kul'turnyy freyming rossiyan i belorusov: postanovka problemy. (Cultural framing of Russians and Belorussians: problem statement) Sotsial'nyy psikholog. (Social psychologist). 2011. iss. 1(21), PP. 71-80. (in Russian)
  2. Fabrikant M.S. Narrativnyy analiz kak metod sotsial'no-psikhologicheskogo issledovaniya. Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoy stepeni kandidata psikhologicheskikh nauk. (Narrative analysis as method of social-psychological investigation. Autoref. diss. … cand of psychology). Minsk. 2012 (in Russian)
  3. Yanchuk V.A. Metodologiya, teoriya i metod v sovremennoy sotsial'noy psikhologii i personologii: integrativno-eklekticheskiy podkhod. (Methodology, theory and method in modern social psychology and personology: integrativeeclectic approach) Minsk. 2000. 416 p.(in Russian)
  4. Yanchuk V.A. Psikhologiya postmoderna. (Psychology of post-modern) Vremya kak faktor izmeneniy lichnosti. Sbornik nauch. trudov. (Time as factor of personality changing. The collection of scientific papers) In A.V. Brushlinsky, V.A. Polikarpov (Eds.). 2003 Minsk PP. 175-201. (in Russian)
  5. Yanchuk V.A. Vvedenie v sovremennuyu sotsial'nuyu psikhologiyu. (Induction into modern social psychology) Minsk. 2005. 768 pp. (in Russian)
  6. Yanchuk V.A. Postmodernistskiy, sotsiokul'turno-interdeterministskiy dialogizm kak perspektiva pozitsionirovaniya v predmete psikhologii. (Post-modernist sociocultural inter-determinist dialogism as perspective of positioning in psychology object) Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii. (Methodology and history of psychology) 2006. Vol. 1., PP. 193-206. (in Russian)
  7. Yanchuk V.A. Postmodernistskaya sotsiokul'turno-interdeterministskaya dialogicheskaya perspektiva metoda psikhologicheskogo issledovaniya (Postmodernist sociocultural inter-determinist perspective of method of psychological investigation) Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii. (Methodology and history of psychology) 2007. Vol. 2. iss. 1. PP. 207-226. (in Russian)
  8. Yanchuk V.A. Postmodernistskaya sotsiokul'turno-interdeterministskaya dialogicheskaya perspektiva ob"yasneniya v psikhologii. (Post-modernist sociocultural inter-determinist dialogic perspective of explanation in psychology) Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii. (Methodology and history of psychology). 2008. Vol. 3. iss. 1. PP. 195-209. (in Russian)
  9. Yanchuk V.A. Integrativno-eklekticheskiy podkhod k analizu psikhologicheskoy fenomenologii. Slovar'-spravochnik (Integrative-eclectic approach to analysis of psychological phenomenology. The guide dictionary) Minsk. 48 pp. Available at: http://vocabulary.ru/dictionary/2 (in Russian)
  10. Yanchuk V.A. Progress v ponimanii psikhologicheskoy fenomenologii: sotsiokul'turno-interdeterministskaya dialogicheskaya perspektiva. (Progress in understanding of psychological phenomenology: sociocultural inter-determinist dialogic perspective) Progress v psikhologii: Kriterii i priznaki. (Progress in psychology: criteria and attributes) In A.L. Zhuravlev, T.L. Martsinkovskaya, A.V. Yurevich (Eds.). 2009. Moscow. PP. 262-285. (in Russian)
  11. Yanchuk V.A. Kul'turnyy freyming kak determinanta vzaimoponimaniya v usloviyakh kul'turnogo mnogoobraziya, (Cultural framing as determinant of mutual understanding in conditions of cultural variety) Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal. (Psychological journal) 2010 iss. 2, PP. 41-48 (in Russian)
  12. Yanchuk V.A. Problema teoretiko-empiricheskogo izucheniya kul'turnogo freyminga blizkorodstvennykh kul'tur i etnosov. (Problem of theoretical and empirical investigation of cultural framing of closely related cultures and ethnic groups) Etnosy razvivayushcheysya Rossii: problemy i perspektivy: materialy pyatoy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem (Abakan, 14–15 dekabrya 2012 g.) (Ethnic groups of developing Russia: problems and perspectives. Materials of 5th All-Russian scientific and practical conference with international party (Abakan, 2012 December 14-15)) In V.G. Morogin (Ed.) Abakan. 2012 PP 20-22. (in Russian)
  13. Yanchuk V.A. Problema teoretiko-empiricheskogo izucheniya kul'turnogo freyminga blizkorodstvennykh kul'tur i etnosov. (Problem of theoretical and empirical investigation of cultural framing of closely related cultures and ethnic groups) Etnosy razvivayushcheysya Rossii: problemy i perspektivy: materialy pyatoy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem (Abakan, 14–15 dekabrya 2012 g.) (Ethnic groups of developing Russia: problems and perspectives. Materials of 5th All-Russian scientific and practical conference with international party (Abakan, 2012 December 14-15)) In V.G. Morogin (Ed.) Abakan. 2012 PP 20-22. (in Russian)
  14. Yanchar S. C., Slife, B. D. Putting it all together: toward a hermeneutic unity of psychology, Journal of Mind and Behavior. 2000. Vol. 21(3), pp. 315–326. (in English)
  15. Goertzen J. R. Dialectical pluralism: a theoretical conceptualization of pluralism in psychology. New Ideas in Psychology. 2010. Vol. 28(2), pp. 201–209. (in English)
  16. Healy P. Toward an integrative, pluralistic psychology: On the hermeneuticodialogical conditions of the possibility for overcoming fragmentation New Ideas in Psychology. 2012. Vol. 30, pp. 271–280 (in English)
  17. Smythe W.E., McKenzie S.A. A vision of dialogical pluralism in psychology. New Ideas in Psychology. 2010. Vol. 28(2), pp. 227–234. (in English)
  18. Teo T. Ontology and scientific explanation: pluralism as an a priori condition of psychology New Ideas in Psychology. 2010. Vol. 28(2), pp. 235–243. (in English)
  19. Valsiner Y. Becoming Integrative in Science: Re-building Contemporary Psychology through Interdisciplinary and International Collaboration, Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. 2007. Vol. 41, pp.1–5. (in English)
  20. Янчук В.А. Постмодернистский, социокультурно-интердетерминистский диалогизм как перспектива позиционирования в предмете психологии Методология и история психологии. 2006 Т. 1., с. 193-206.
  21. Ranganath K.A., Spellman B.A., Joy-Gaba J.A. Cognitive ‘‘category-based induction’’ research and social ‘‘persuasion’’ research are each about what makes arguments believable: A tale of two literatures. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2010. Vol. 5, pp. 115–122. (in English)
  22. Meiser T. Much Pain, Little Gain? Paradigm-Specific Models and Methods in Experimental Psychology // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2011. Vol. 6(2), pp. 183-191. (in English)
  23. Sternberg R.J., Grigorenko E.L. () Unified psychology American Psychologist. 2001. Vol. 56(12), pp. 1069–1079. (in English)
  24. Bandura A. Social Foundation of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 1986 (in English)
  25. Bandura A. Toward Psychology of Human Activity // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2006. Vol. 1. № 2, pp. 164-179. (in English)
  26. Franklin C.W. Theoretical perspectives in social psychology. - Boston: Little, Brown and Company. 1982 (in English)
  27. Янчук В. А. Методология, теория и метод в современной социальной психологии и персонологии: интегративно-эклектический подход. Минск: Бестпринт. 2000. 416 c.
  28. Янчук В. А. Проблема теоретико-эмпирического изучения культурного фрейминга близкородственных культур и этносов Этносы развивающейся России: проблемы и перспективы: материалы пятой Всероссийской научно-практической конференции с международным участием (Абакан, 14–15 декабря 2012 г.) / под общ. ред. В. Г. Морогина. – Абакан: Издательство ФГБОУ ВПО «Хакасский государственный университет им. Н. Ф. Катанова», 2012. с 20-22.
  29. Янчук В. А. Культурный фрейминг как детерминанта взаимопонимания в условиях культурного многообразия, Психологический журнал. 2010. № 2, с. 41-48
Published: 
06.10.2014
Short text (in English):
download
(downloads: 78)