Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology

Izvestiya of Saratov University.

ISSN 2304-9790 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9013 (Online)


For citation:

Zakharova I. V., Trenina E. V. Pedagogical impact of educational robotics on younger schoolchildren. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2024, vol. 13, iss. 1, pp. 16-25. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2024-13-1-16-25, EDN: USXEOY

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 88)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
73. 031
EDN: 
USXEOY

Pedagogical impact of educational robotics on younger schoolchildren

Autors: 
Zakharova Inna V., Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University named after IN Ulyanov
Trenina Ekaterina V., Gubernatorial Engineering Lyceum No. 102
Abstract: 

The relevance of the study on teaching robotics in primary school is due to the digitalization trends of modern society and the need to prepare children for a new technological era. The objective of the study is to identify what organizational, administrative and pedagogical conditions are necessary to make teaching robotics eff ective in primary school. The article hypothesizes that educational robotics taught as an extracurricular educational activity prompts personal development of younger schoolchildren only if the school has an inspiring and creative atmosphere, and the relationships between the participants of the educational process are based on the principles of cooperation pedagogy. Participants: second grade students (n = 80) of “Governor’s Engineering Lyceum No. 102” Ulyanovsk, aged from 7 to 9 (M=8.3 years, SD= 0.458), 52.5% – boys, 47.5% – girls. Methods (tools). A set of diagnostic techniques was used to assess the pedagogical eff ectiveness of educational robotics: the “Magic Flower” technique (M. R. Ginzburg) was used to identify students’ dominant type of motivation; the “Sequence of Events” technique (A. N. Bernstein) was used to assess intellectual abilities, logical thinking, generalization abilities; parents (n=80) were surveyed with the help of the questionnaires “The Map of Giftedness” (Robert F. DeHaan, Jack Kough) and “Diagnostics of Creative Abilities” (F. Tutl, L. Becker) to assess the creative potential of children, the expression of their abilities and inclinations for various types of activities. In order to identify the organizational, administrative and pedagogical conditions for the eff ectiveness of educational robotics, interviews were conducted with primary school teachers (n=18); additionally, such methods as participant observation and the analysis of pedagogical experience were used. Results. The pedagogical impact of teaching robotics to younger schoolchildren was revealed. The methodological, psychological, pedagogical, organizational and administrative conditions for the eff ectiveness of teaching robotics in primary school were determined. The main conclusions. Robotics in primary school can be taught as both an educational and extracurricular activity. To identify and develop the abilities of students in the fi eld of technical design, an educational organization needs an innovative material base, methodological support, and a suffi cient level of professional competence of the teaching staff . Cooperation between schools, institutions of additional education and high-tech enterprises is recommended. It is important that the interaction between the participants of the educational process is built on the principles of cooperation pedagogy in order to stimulate the creative activity of students and motivate them to participate in exhibitions and project competitions.

Reference: 
  1. Фортыгина С. Н. Программа подготовки будущих педагогов в области образовательной робототехники // Ученые записки университета им. П. Ф. Лесгафта. 2017. № 10 (152). С. 285–287. EDN: ZSJVMJ
  2. Ступин А. А., Ступина Е. Е., Каменев Р. В., Классов А. Б. Применение сквозных цифровых технологий для обучения школьников программированию робототехнических устройств // Сибирский педагогический журнал. 2022. № 4. С. 51–63. https://doi.org/10.15293/1813-4718.2204.04
  3. Gdansky N. I., Kulikova N. L., Budnik A. A., Sokolov I. V. STEM technology in the study of educational robotics // Revista Inclusiones. 2020. Vol. 7, iss. S2-3. P. 206–219. EDN: RSUYVN
  4. Гагарина Д. А., Гагарин А. С. Образовательная робототехника: анализ вызовов рынка // Образовательная политика. 2021. № 4 (88). С. 90–103. EDN: EOFSDQ
  5. Bezerra J. E., De Lima R. W., Queiroz P. G. G. A study of the publications of educational robotics: A systematic review of literature // IEEE Latin America Transactions. 2018. Vol. 16, iss. 4. P. 1193–1199. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2018.8362156
  6. González Fernández M. O., Flores González Y. A., Muñoz López C. Panorama de la robótica educativa a favor del aprendizaje STEAM // Eureka. 2021. Vol. 18, iss. 2. P. 230. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2021.v18.i2.230
  7. Angel-Fernandez J. M., Vincze M. Towards a formal definition of educational robotics // Proceedings of the Austrian Robotics Workshop / eds. Ph. Zech, J. Piater. Innsbruck : Innsbruck University Press, 2018. 76 p. https://doi.org/10.15203/3187-22-1-08
  8. Schiffer S., Ferrein A. ERIKA – Early Robotics Introduction at Kindergarten Age // Multimodal Technologies and Interact. 2018. Vol. 2, iss. 4. Article number 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2040064
  9. Sullivan A., Kazakoff E. R., Bers M. U. The wheels on the bot go round and round: Robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten // Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice. 2013. Vol. 12. P. 203–219. https://doi.org/10.28945/1887
  10. Рязанова З. Б., Сорокин С. С., Солин С. В. Применение образовательной робототехники в обучении детей с раннего возраста // Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2020. № 3. C. 22. https://doi.org/10.17513/ spno.29799
  11. Чернобровкин В. А., Кувшинова И. А., Тупикина Д. В., Бачурин И. В. Воспитательно-образовательные возможности образовательной робототехники с использованием андроидного робототехнического устройства в сфере дошкольного образования // Перспективы науки и образования. 2020. № 1 (43). С. 134–149. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2020.1.10 
  12. Исмаилов Г. М., Матевосян Т. В., Слободенюк А. И., Ноткина В. О., Невиницына В. С., Осипкина Ю. А., Скорнякова Л. В. Внедрение образовательной робототехники и 3D моделирования в общеобразовательной школе // Sciences of Europe. 2021. № 83-3 (83). С. 26–29. https://doi.org/10.24412/3162- 2364- 2021-83-3-26-29
  13. ЗайцеваС. А., Иванов В. В., Киселев В. С., Зубаков А. Ф. Развитие образовательной робототехники: проблемы и перспективы // Образование и наука. 2022. Т. 24, № 2. С. 84–115. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639- 2022-2-84-115
  14. Глухов С. В., Дикой А. А., Дикая И. В. Образовательная робототехника – новая парадигма образования 21 века: проблемы, содержание, опыт // Технологоэкономическое образование. 2014. № 2. С. 64–70. EDN: WKEVOX
  15. Дахин А. Н. Педагогика робототехники как возникающая инновация школьной технологии // Народное образование. 2015. № 4 (1447). С. 157–161. EDN: TWGTRB
  16. Захарова И. В. Конкурентоспособность университета как гибридной структуры регионального образовательного пространства // Регионология. 2020. № 28 (2). С. 377–399. https://doi.org/10.15507/2413- 1407.111.028.202002.377-399
  17. Особенности психического развития детей 6‒7-летнего возраста / под ред. Д. Б. Эльконина, А. Л. Венгера. М. : Педагогика, 1988. 135 с.
  18. Бернштейн А. Н. Экспериментально-психологическая методика распознавания душевных болезней. М. : Печатня С. П. Яковлева, 1908. 19 с.
  19. Савенков А. И. Одарённый ребёнок в массовой школе. М. : Сентябрь, 2001. 208 с.
  20. Tuttle F. B., Becker L. A., Sousa J. A. Characteristics and Identifi cation of Gifted and Talented Students. Washington : National Education Association, 1988.163 p.
  21. Газейкина А. И., Пронин С. Г. Формирование когнитивных универсальных учебных действий при обучении робототехнике учащихся основной школы // Педагогическое образование в России. 2015. № 7. С. 42–49. EDN: UCIHLL
  22. Gratani F., Giannandrea L., Renieri A., Annessi M. Fostering Students’ Problem-Solving Skills Through Educational Robotics in Primary School // Education in & with Robotics to Foster 21st-Century Skills. EDUROBOTICS 2021. Studies in Computational Intelligence / ed. by M. Malvezzi, D. Alimisis, M. Moro. Springer Cham, 2021. Vol. 982. P. 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 030-77022-8_1
  23. Jawawi D. N. A., Jamal N. N., Abdul Halim S., Sa’adon N. A., Mamat R., Isa M. A., Mohamad R., Abdull Hamed H. N. Nurturing secondary school student computational thinking through educational robotics // International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning. 2022. Vol. 17, iss. 3. P. 117–128. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i03.27311
  24. Jäggle G., Lammer L., Hieber H., Vincze M. Technological literacy through outreach with educational robotics // Robotics in Education. RiE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing / ed. by M. Merdan, W. Lepuschitz, G. Koppensteiner, R. Balogh, D. Obdržálek. Springer Cham, 2019. Vol. 1023. P. 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26945-6_11
Received: 
05.07.2023
Accepted: 
15.09.2023
Published: 
29.03.2024
Short text (in English):
(downloads: 48)