Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology

Izvestiya of Saratov University.

ISSN 2304-9790 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9013 (Online)

For citation:

Drobysheva T. V., Emelyanova T. P. Viability of Urban Residents: Content of the Concept, Theoretical and Empirical Possibilities of Its Application. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2020, vol. 9, iss. 3, pp. 232-240. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2020-9-3-232-240

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 139)
Article type: 

Viability of Urban Residents: Content of the Concept, Theoretical and Empirical Possibilities of Its Application

Drobysheva Tatiana V., Institute of Psychology RAS
Emelyanova Tatiana P., Institute of Psychology RAS

The purpose of the study presented in the article is to theoretically and methodologically substantiate the appropriateness of applying the concept of “viability of urban residents” in the studies of urban social psychology. Interdisciplinary analysis of approaches to the study of the problem of “human being and the city” has been carried out. It is noted that introduction of the concept of “viability of urban residents” into scientific circulation will allow, on the one hand, to study factors and mechanisms of vital resources of different groups of urban residents from a new perspective, and, on the other hand, it will expand the subject area of psychology of large social groups. The task that we set was to include the category of “viability of city residents” in the existing thesaurus of concepts used in the study of social psychology of the city. It has been shown that the existing directions of research on the perception of the city, social representations of residents, satisfaction with life in the city, approaches through phenomena of identity and values of residents, viewed from different angles, provided understanding of the variety of psychological factors of urban residents’ viability. It has been stated that the problem of accumulating this knowledge by means of introducing a concept which synthesizes various aspects of social psychology of urban residents is becoming urgent. It has been shown that this role can be fulfilled by the concept of residents’ viability, which, due to its many aspects, will be useful for studying the potential that provides a productive and proactive start in the life of large social groups of urban residents (age-related, ethnic, religious, professional, etc.). Such components of the viability of large groups of urban residents as cognitive, value-affective, and motivational-volitional components have been distinguished. The content of each of these components has been discussed and ways of their empirical research have been proposed when comparing viability of urban residents with different economic, geographical, environmental and cultural characteristics.


1.  Radina N. K. Gorod v prostranstve i vremeni: problemy territorial’noy identichnosti v kontekste sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh izmeneniy [City in Space and Time: Problems of Territorial Identity in Context of Socio-Economic Changes]. Nizhniy Novgorod, DEKOM Publ., 2015. 344 p. (in Russian).

2.  Drobysheva T. V., Zhuravlev A. L., eds. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskiye issledovaniya goroda [Socio-Psychological Researches of City]. Moscow, Institute of Psichology RAS Publ., 2016. 267 p. (in Russian).

3.  Afanas’yeva V. V., ed. Filosofi ya goroda [Philosophy of City]. Saratov, Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta, 2012. 244 p. (in Russian).

4.  Nestik T. A., Zhuravlev A. L. Psikhologiya global’nykh riskov [Psychology of Global Risks]. Moscow, Institute of Psichology RAS Publ., 2018. 402 p. (in Russian).

5.  Ager A., Annan J., Panter-Brick C. Resilience From conceptualization to effective intervention. In: Policy Brief for Humanitarian and Development Agencies, 2013. Р. 17. Available at: (accessed 1 April 2020).

6.  Ager A. Annual research review: resilience and child well-being – public policy implications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2013, vol. 54, iss. 4, pp. 488–500. DOI:

7.  Panter-Brick C., Leckman J. F. Editorial commentary: resilience in child development – interconnected pathways to well-being – public policy implications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2013, vol. 54, iss. 4, pp. 333–336. DOI:

8.  Resilient Cities, Resilient Lives. Learning from the 100RC Network. Abridged Version, July, 2019. 109 p. Available at: (accessed 4 April 2020).

9.  Nesterova A. A. Infl uence of Person’s Basic Beliefs on Adaptation and Viability in Job Loss Situation. Uchenyye zapiski RGSU [Scientifi c notes of RSSU], 2010, no. 11 (87), pp. 150–153 (in Russian).

10. Emel’yanova T. P. Two Cities in the Youth’s Representations: A Comparative Analysis. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill. Journal online, 2015, no. 2. Available at: (accessed 17 April 2020) (in Russian).

11.  Shkurko T. A., Balakina A. A. Sotsial’no-psikhologicheskiye osobennosti otnosheniy k drugim lyudyam i otnosheniye k gorodu zhiteley megapolisa, bol’shogo i malogo gorodov [Socio-Psychological Features of Relations to Other People and Attitude of Residents of Megapolis, Big and Small Cities to City]. Rostov-on-Don, Southern Federal University Publ., 2014. 207 p. (in Russian).

12. Rouquette M. L., Sautkina E., Castro P., Félonneau M.-L., Guillou-Michel E. Social Representations: Theory and Environmental Studies. In: Designing social innovation: planning, building, evaluating. Göttingen, Hogrefe & Huber Publ., 2005, pp. 107–115.

13. Theoretical and Applied Issues of Research into Human Environments (special issue). Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2019, vol. 16, iss. 1, pp. 5–126 (in Russian).

14. Coolen H., Meesters J. Editorial special issue: house, home and dwelling. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 2012, vol. 27, iss. 1, pp. 1–10. DOI:

15. Manzo L. For Better or Worse: Exploring Multiple Dimensions of Place Meaning. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2005, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 67–86. DOI:

16. Bobrova Ye. A., Tikhomirova S. V. Psychological home meaning as decision factor for low carbon retrofi t. World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 2018, no. 6, vol. 6. Available at: (accessed 17 April 2020) (in Russian).

17. Hoorn J. F. From Lonely to Resilient through Humanoid Robots: Building a New Framework of Resilience. Journal of Robotics, Jul., 2018. Available at: 1 April 2020). DOI:

18. Belanche D., Casaló L. V., Flavián C. Understanding the Cognitive, Affective and Evaluative Components of Social Urban Identity: Determinants, Measurement, and Practical Consequences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2017, vol. 50, pp. 138–153. DOI:

19. Belanche D., Casaló L.V., Orús C. City attachment and use of urban services: Benefi ts for smart cities. Cities, 2016, vol. 50, pp. 75–81. DOI:

20. Pokatilovskaya E. N., Shibayeva L. V. Image of a City of Accommodation in Representations of Residents with Different City Identity. Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and Economic Psychology, 2019, vol. 4, no. 2 (14), pp. 192–209 (in Russian).

21. Rossman V. V poiskakh Chetvertogo Rima: Rossiyskiye debaty o perenose stolitsy [In Search of the Fourth Rome: Russian Debates on Transfer of the Capital]. Moscow, Higher School of Economics Publ., 2014. 288 p. (in Russian).

22. Drobysheva T. V., Voytenko M. Yu. The Factors of the Personality’s Socio-Psychological Well-Being in the Megapolis: The Children’s Representation about City of the Living. Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and Economic Psychology, 2017, vol. 2, no. 1 (5), pp. 169–189. Available at: (accessed 17 April 2020) (in Russian).

23.  Hobfoll S. Conservation of Resources. A New Attempt at Conceptualizing Stress. American Psychologist, 1989, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 513–524. DOI:

24.  Zharova E. N. Sravnitel’nyy analiz individualisticheskikh i kollektivisticheskikh tsennostnykh oriyentatsiy kak sotsial’no-psikhologicheskikh kharakteristik molodezhi (na primere urbanizirovannoy i neurbanizirovannoy sredy) [Comparative Analysis of Individualistic and Collectivistic Value Orientations as Socio-Psychological Characteristics of Youth (the Case Study of Urbanized and Non-Urbanized Environment)]. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Psychol.). Moscow, 2010. 218 p. (in Russian).

25.  Miklyayeva A. V., Rumyantseva P. V. Gorodskaya identichnost’ zhitelya sovremennogo megapolisa: resurs lichnostnogo blagopoluchiya ili zona povyshennogo riska? [Urban Identity of a Modern Megalopolis Resident: Resource for Personal Well-Being or High-Risk Zone?]. St. Petersburg, Rech’ Publ., 2011. 160 p. (in Russian).

26.  Lalli M. Urban-Related identity: Theory, Measurement, and Empirical Findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1992, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 285–303. DOI:

27.  Zachesova I. A. Everyday City Discourse: Intentional Aspect. Evraziyskoye nauchnoye ob”yedineniye [Eurasian Scientifi c Association], 2019, no. 5-7 (51), pp. 459–462. Available at: (accessed 18 April 2020). DOI: (in Russian).

28.  Drobysheva T. V., Karpova M. V. Socio-Psychological Factors of Teenagers’ Ideas about City of Residence. Psikhologiya – nauka budushchego: materialy VII mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii molodykh uchenykh [Psychology is Science of Future. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of young researchers]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology of RAS Publ., 2017, pp. 241–244 (in Russian).

29.  Bogomaz S. A., Matsuta V. V. Subjective Evaluation of Basic Value’s Realizability in Urban Environment. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 2012, no. 46, pp. 67–75 (in Russian).

30.  Murav’yeva O. I., Litvina S. A., Kruzhkova O. V., Bogomaz S. A. Russian Young City-Dwellers: Structural Features of Urban Identity. Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2017, vol. 7, iss. 1, pp. 63–80 (in Russian). DOI:

31.  Shorokhova E. V. Teoreticheskiye problemy issledovaniya bol’shikh sotsial’nykh grupp [Theoretical Problems of Research of Large Social Groups]. In: Zhuravlev A. L., ed. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya [Social Psychology]. Moscow, PER SE Publ., 2002, pp. 252–266 (in Russian).

32.  Panter-Brick C., Eggerman M. Understanding Culture, Resilience, and Mental Health. In: M. Ungar, ed. The Production of Hope, The Social Ecology of Resilience. New York, Springer, 2012, pp. 369–386.