Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology

Izvestiya of Saratov University.

ISSN 2304-9790 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9013 (Online)


For citation:

Frolova S. V. Socio-cognitive Types of Experiencing Reality and Commitment to One’s Country. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2018, vol. 7, iss. 3, pp. 270-277. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2018-7-3-270-277

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 71)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article

Socio-cognitive Types of Experiencing Reality and Commitment to One’s Country

Autors: 
Frolova Svetlana V., Saratov State University
Abstract: 

It is proposed to distinguish nine socio-cognitive types of reality experiencing based on different types of combination of personal social well-being and the level of its socio-cultural integration of the imaginative sphere. The concept of level of sociocultural integration of the personal imaginative sphere, which was conceptualized and operationalized by the author in her precious works, shows how the system of significantly experienced secondary images of the world integrates a person with the socio-cultural environment of a large social community of the country. We singled out types of reality experiencing, which are cognitively integrated into and cognitively differentiated from the culture of the country’s social community, as well as a mixed cognitive type characterized by cultural diversity of meaningfully experienced images of the world. We have described the types of personal experiences, depending on satisfaction or lack of satisfaction with one’s social well-being, as well as the type of experiencing reality, which is tolerant of socially-conditioned difficulties. It is supposed that the presence of socio-cognitive types of experiencing socio-cultural reality is typical of people committed to their country. The empirical study was performed on a sample of 500 people aged 19 to 25 years (320 girls and women, average age 22 years, and 180 boys and men, average age 22 years); 400 citizens of Russia and 100 citizens of Kazakhstan. The following diagnostic toolset was used: psycho-diagnostic questionnaire “My social well-being” (A. A. Grachev and A. A. Rusalinova); questionnaire “Commitment to one’s country”; image-associative test, which allows to establish the coefficient of socio-cultural integration of the individual imaginative sphere. It was established that people who are committed to their country are cognitively integrated with the socio-cultural environment types of experiences of reality, the most common of which is a cognitively integrated type tolerant to social difficulties.

Reference: 

​1. Vygotsky L. S. Sobr. soch.: v 6 t. [Collection of works: in 6 vols.]. Moscow, 1984. Vol. 4. 432 p. (in Russian).

2. Shikhirev P. N. Sovremennaya sotsial’naya psikhologiya [Modern social psychology]. Moscow, 1999. 448 p. (in Russian).

3. Pochebut L. G., Meyzhis I. A. Social’naya psihologiya [Social psychology]. St. Petersburg, 2010. 672 p. (in Russian).

4. Kuznetsova S. A. Migratsionnye ustanovki kak predmet sotsial’no-psikhologicheskikh issledovaniy [Migration Attitudes as the Subject of Social Psychological Research]. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo [Social Psychology and Society], 2013, no. 4, pp. 34–46 (in Russian).

5. Berry J. W., Phinney J. S., Sam D. L., Vedder P. Immigrant youth: acculturation, identity, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: an International Review, 2006, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 303–332.

6. Buchanan P. J. State of emergency. The third world invasion and conquest of America Edge of destruction. New York, 2006. 320 p.

7. Laurin K., Shepherd S., Kay A. C. Restricted emigration, system inescapability, and defense of the status quo: system-yustifying consequences of restricted exit opportunities. Psychological Science, 2010, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1075 –1082.

8. Frolova S. V. Makropsikhologicheskiy analiz emigratsionnykh namereniy molodezhi [Macropsychological analysis of young people’s emigratory intentions]. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2010, vol. 10, iss. 3, pp. 91–96 (in Russian).

9. Rosenmann A., Reese G., Cameron J. E. Social identities in a globalized world: challenges and opportunities for collective action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2016, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 202–221.

10. Frolova S. V. Model’ faktorov priverzhennosti lichnosti social’noy obshhnosti [The Model of Individual Commitment Factors to Social Community]. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2013, vol. 13, iss. 4, pp. 80–86 (in Russian).

11. Bassin F. V. “Znachashkhie” perezhivaniya i problema sobstvenno-psihologicheskoy zakonomernosti [“Meaningful” experiences and the problem of key psychological pattern]. Voprosy psychologii [Voprosy Psychologii], 1972, no. 3, pp. 105–124 (in Russian).

12. Vasilyuk F. E. Psikhologiya perezhivaniya (analiz preodoleniya kriticheskikh situatsiy) [Psychology of experience (analysis of overcoming of critical situations)]. Moscow, 1984. 200 p. (in Russian).

13. Dil’tey V. Opisatel’naya psihologiya [Descriptive psychology]. St. Petersburg, 1996. 160 p. (in Russian, trans. from German).

14. Shpet G. G. Psikhologiya sotsial’nogo bytiya [Psychology of social being]. Moscow, Voronezh, 1996. 492 p. (in Russian).

15. Sadkova D. A. Sotsial’noe samochuvstvie molodezhi: adaptatsiya k obshchestvennym transformatsiyam [Social well-being of young people: adaptation to social transformation]. Problemy razvitiyа territorii [Problems of territory’s development], 2014, no. 6 (74), pp. 91–99 (in Russian).

16. Kuz’micheva L. N. Sotsial’noe samochuvstvie rossiyskoy molodezhi: vliyanie kul’turnykh ustanovok [Social well-being of the Russian youth: infl uence of cultural installations]. Gumanitarnye, sotsial’no-еkonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki [Humanities, social-economic and social sciences], 2015, no. 6, pp. 160–163 (in Russian).

17. Grachev A. A., Rusalinova A. A. Sotsial’noe samochuvstvie cheloveka v organizatsii [Social “self-feeling” of the person at an organization]. Izv. Ros. gos. ped. un-ta im. A. I. Gertsena [Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Science], 2007, vol. 8, no. 30, pp. 7–17 (in Russian).

18. Gostev A. A. Psikhologiya vtorichnogo obraza [Psychology of secondary image]. Moscow, 2007. 512 p. (in Russian).

19. Frolova S. V. Sotsial’no-kognitivnye osnovaniya psikhologicheskoy priverzhennosti svoey strane [Sociocognitive grounds for psychological commitment to own country]. Moscow, 2017. 153 p. (in Russian).

20. Maslou A. Psikhologiya bytiya [Toward a Psychology of Being]. Moscow, 1997. 300 p. (in Russian, trans. from English).

21. Rusalinova A. A. Sotsial’noe samochuvstvie cheloveka kak sotsial’no-psikhologicheskiy fenomen [The social well-being of a person as a socio-psychological phenomenon]. St. Petersburg, 2013. 246 p. (in Russian).

Published: 
28.08.2018