Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology

Izvestiya of Saratov University.

ISSN 2304-9790 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9013 (Online)


For citation:

Tolochek V. A. Manifest and latent social groups: Phenomenon, evolution, determinants. Part 2. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2023, vol. 12, iss. 2, pp. 137-148. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2023-12-2-137-148, EDN: SFLTLY

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 77)
Полный текст в формате PDF(En):
(downloads: 33)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
159.9:316.6
EDN: 
SFLTLY

Manifest and latent social groups: Phenomenon, evolution, determinants. Part 2

Autors: 
Tolochek Vladimir A., Institute of Psychology RAS
Abstract: 

The aim of the research is to study the features of the social environment as potential conditions for the formation, functioning and evolution of latent social groups. Hypotheses: 1) there are pre-forms of social alliances of people (which can be tentatively called latent social groups); 2) diff erent conditions of a subject’s external and internal environment (including features perceived by a person as subjectively signifi cant for them in relation to certain life goals) might be the reasons why the pre-forms appear. The methods of the research are as follows: theoretical and categorical analysis, the study of literary sources, empirical research (questionnaires), multidimensional methods of parametric statistics. According to the author’s methodology (questionnaire “Dynamics of professional life style” – DPLS), respondents assessed the following variables: the role conditions of the social environment play as “factors of professionalism”, and the dynamics of their professionalism from 20 to 65 years (retrospectively to the current age and prospectively – predicting the dynamics of subsequent evolution); their socio-demographic and offi cial characteristics were also recorded. 482 employees, men and women aged 30 to 50 years (132 civil servants, 129 engineers and heads of departments of manufacturing plants, 221 managers) were interviewed as participants of the study. The total sample was divided into groups several times. As criteria for division, relative characteristics (calculated by the formulas) of “career speed”, “managerial experience”, “family life experience”were used. The results of the empirical study confi rm the working hypotheses. When dividing the sample according to diff erent criteria – both obvious (men / women, specialists / managers, etc.) and relative, the groups diff er signifi cantly in a number of variables (environmental conditions marked as “factors of professionalism”). Conclusion: in one social space-time, diff erent social alliances, structures, to a greater or lesser extent of their expression (manifestation), development, and active functioning as social groups can coexist. There are reasons to single out the phenomenon of latent social groups (LSG) as pre-forms of manifest social groups with subsequent diff erent trajectories of their possible development. LSG are possible alliances of people who are similar to each other in a number of important aspects of life (value orientations, lifestyle, etc.), and who are potentially capable of integration and interaction (to achieve common goals, to establish comfortable interpersonal communication, to maintain typical patterns of behavior, etc.). LGS are the pre-stages of various social structures representing their possible formation and development. Representatives of some latent social groups diff er from others both in terms of their preference and recognition of the role of individual environmental conditions and individual social spaces (parental family, their family, work groups, etc.). There may be some other “deep factors” behind people’s recognition of the subjective signifi cance of diff erent conditions of the social environment for them.

Reference: 
  1. Колесникова Е. И. Проявления коллективного субъекта учебной деятельности в студенческой группе // Вестник Самарской гуманитарной академии. Серия: Психология. 2011. № 1 (9). С. 113‒121.
  2. Сидоренков А. В. Психология малой группы: методология и теория. М. : Юрайт, 2018. 185 с.
  3. Шамионов Р. М., Бочарова Е. Е., Невский Е. В. Роль ценностей в приверженности молодежи различным видам социальной активности // Социальная психология и общество. 2022. Т. 13, № 1. C. 124‒141. https:// doi.org/10.17759/sps.2022130108
  4. Толочек В. А., Денисова В. Г., Журавлева Н. И. Динамика и условия профессионального становления субъекта в социономических профессиях // Психологический журнал. 2011. Т. 32, № 6. С. 41–48.
  5. Толочек В. А. Психология труда. СПб. : Питер, 2021. 496 с.
  6. Толочек В. А. Технологии профессионального отбора. М. : Юрайт, 2021. 253 с.
  7. Толочек В. А. Декларированные и латентные социальные группы: феномен, эволюция, детерминанты. Часть 1 // Известия Саратовского университета. Новая серия. Серия: Акмеология образования. Психология развития. 2022. Т. 11, вып. 3 (43). С. 220–231. https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2022-11-3-220-231
  8. Андреева Г. М. Социальная психология. М. : Изд-во Моск. ун-та, 1980. 416 с.
  9. Андреева Г. М. Социальная психология. М. : Аспект Пресс, 2005. 365 с.
  10. Парыгин Б. Д. Социальная психология. СПб. : СПбГУП, 2003. 616 с.
  11. Петровский А. В., Шпалинский В. В. Социальная психология коллектива. М. : Просвещение, 1978. 176 с.
  12. McClure B. A. Putting a New-Spin on Groups: The Science of Chaos. London : Lawrence Erlbaum, 1998. 248 р.
  13. Tajfel H. Intergroup Behavior, Social Comparison and Social Change. Unpublished Katz-Newcomb Lectures. Ann Arbor : University of Michigan, 1974. 24 p.
  14. Tajfel H., Turner J. An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Confl ict // The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations / eds. W. Austin, S. Worchel. Monterey, CA : Brooks/Cole, 1979. P. 33‒47.
  15. Tajfel H., Turner J. The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior // Psychology of Intergroup Relations / eds. S. Worchel, W. Austin. 2nd ed. Chicago : Nelson-Hall, 1986. P. 7‒24.
  16. Turner J. Social Categorization and the Self-Concept: A Social Cognitive Theory of Group Behavior // Advances in Group Processes: Theory and Research / ed. E. J. Lawler. Greenwich, CT : JAI Press, 1985. Vol. 2. P. 77‒122.
  17. Turner J. Rediscovering the Social Group: A SelfCategorization Theory. Oxford : Basil Blackwell, 1987. 645 p.
  18. Сидоренков А. В. Неформальные подгруппы в малой группе: социально-психологический анализ. Ростов н/Д : АПСН СКНЦ ВШ, 2003. 436 с.
  19. Arrow H. Stability, bistability, and instability in small group infl uence patterns // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997. Vol. 72, no. 1. Р. 75‒85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.75
  20. Arrow H., McGrath J. E., Berdahl J. L. Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications Inc., 2000. 344 p. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204666
  21. McGrath J. E., Tschan F. Temporal Matters in Social Psychology. Examining the Role of Time in the Lives of Groups and Individuals. Washington, DC : American Psychological Association, 2004. 179 p.
  22. Poole M. S., Seibold D. R., McPhee R. D. The Structuration of Group Decisions // Communication and Group Decision Making / eds. R. Y. Hirokawa, M. S. Poole. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications Inc., 1996. P. 114‒146.
  23. Von Cranach M. Toward a theory of the acting group // Understanding Group Behavior: Small Group Processes and Interpersonal Relations / eds. E. Witte, J. H. Davis. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996. P. 147‒187.
  24. Сидоренков А. В., Сидоренкова И. И. Доверие в малых группах // Вопросы психологии. 2011. № 1. С. 94‒105.
  25. Cohen A. et al. Effective Behavior in Organizations. Homewood, Ill : Richard D. Irvin, Inc., 1980. 177 р.
  26. Tuckman B. W., Jensen M. A. Stages of small group development revisited // Group and Organizational Studies. 1977. Vol. 2, iss. 4. P. 419‒427. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117700200404
  27. Парыгин Б. Д. Социальная психология как наука. Ленинград : Изд-во Ленингр. ун-та, 1965. 208 с.
  28. Tajfel H., Turner J. C. The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In: Jost J. T., Sidanius J., eds. Political Psychology: Key Readings. New York : Psychology Press, 2004. P. 276–293. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-16
  29. Turner J. C., Reynolds K. J. Self-Categorization Theory // Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology / eds. P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, E. T. Higgins. Los Angeles ; London : Sage Publications Ltd., 2012. P. 399–417. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n46
  30. Знаков В. В. Психология возможного. М. : Изд-во «Институт психологии РАН», 2021. 308 с.
Received: 
30.12.2022
Accepted: 
15.03.2023
Published: 
30.06.2023
Short text (in English):
(downloads: 33)