Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology

Izvestiya of Saratov University.

ISSN 2304-9790 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9013 (Online)

For citation:

Dmitrenko A. Y., Sayapina N. N. Interdisciplinary Approach to Studying Personal Responsibility. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2020, vol. 9, iss. 2, pp. 112-117. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2020-9-2-112-117

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 41)
Article type: 

Interdisciplinary Approach to Studying Personal Responsibility

Dmitrenko Andrey Yu., Krasnodar Higher Military Aviation School named after Hero of the Soviet Union A.K. Serov
Sayapina Nataliya N., Saratov State University

The relevance of the study is determined by the need to form an active personality able to follow the principle of responsibility for decisions made to oneself and the people around. It is emphasized that responsibility is a multidimensional concept and various fields of knowledge study it. The purpose of the research presented in the article is to get a better understanding of the responsibility of the individual from the perspective of sociology and psychology. The analysis of the works of sociologists and psychologists demonstrated that the concept under study has two sides – social (external) and psychological (internal) ones. This conclusion allows us to distinguish two components in the structure of responsibility: social and personal components. Their balanced functioning makes for the effective activity of the individual as well as society as a whole. Social aspect of individual responsibility is interpreted by a number of positions: awareness of the personal role in the system of social relations; constant observance of the established rules; assessment of their actions; willingness to be responsible for decisions made. Psychological aspect of the individual’s responsibility is demonstrated by its maturity in making decisions that allow to take adequate actions, despite the fact that it would be easier to use other, less effective efforts. The study of responsibility from these two perspectives makes it possible to conclude that there is insufficient information about it in scientific literature and we can characterize this field of study of personal responsibility as а promising one. We demonstrated that responsibility of an individual the authors are studying can remain at two levels: executive and active levels. The first level identifies responsibility for oneself / one’s actions, the second implies a volitional decision in regard to responsibility for other people. The description of these levels in scientific literature is not in high demand, which is why the study of these levels has a significant prospect. It is noted that the formation of personal responsibility occurs under the influence of principles developed by society and the requirements applicable to it.


1. G. V. Osipov, coordinating ed. Sotsiologicheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Sociological Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Мoscow, NORMA Publ., 2000. 488 p. (in Russian).
2. Ergazina A. A. Strategic Conditions of Forming the University Student’s Social Responsibility in Intercultural Activity. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern Problems of Science and Education], 2016, no. 5, p. 276 (in Russian).
3. Ruzhentsev S. A. Moral Ideals and Social Responsibility in Politics. Istoricheskiye, fi losofskiye, politicheskiye i yuridicheskiye nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedeniye. Voprosy teorii i praktiki [Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice], 2016, no. 8 (70), pр. 190–196 (in Russian).
4. Orekhovskiy A. I. Filosofi ya otvetstvennosti. Metodologicheskiy, kontseptual’no-teoreticheskiy, pravovoyanalitiko-prognosticheskiy aspekty [Philosophy of Responsibility. Methodological, Conceptual and Theoretical, Legal, Analytical and Prognostic Aspects]. Moscow, Algorithm Publ., 2015. 320 p. (in Russian).
5. Gulevskaya A. F., Maksimov V. P. Pedagogicheskiye usloviya formirovaniya sotsial’noy otvetstvennosti studentov ekonomicheskikh spetsial’nostey [Pedagogical Conditions for Formation of Social Responsibility of Students of Economic Specialties]. Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, SakhSU Publ., 2012. 208 p. (in Russian).
6. Freud Z. Budushchee odnoy illynzii [The future of an illusion]. Khar`kov, Folio Publ., 2013. 160 p. (in Russian).
7. Fromm E. Imet’ ili byt’? [To have or to be?]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2018. 320 p. (in Russian).
8. Dmitrenko A. Yu. Refl ection of Problems of Responsibility in istorical and Philosophical Thought. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk [International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences], 2019, no. 2–2, pp. 18–23 (in Russian). DOI:
9. Rotter J. B. Social Learning and Clinical Psychology. New York, Prentice-Hall, 1954. 466 p.
10. Maslou A. Motivatsiya i lichnost’ [Motivation and Personality]. 3rd ed. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2008. 351 p. (in Russian, trans. from English).
11. Yalom I. Ekzistentsial’naya psikhoterapiya [Existential Psychotherapy]. Moscow, RIMIS Publ., 2008. 608 p. (in Russian).
12. Muzdybayev K. Psikhologiya otvetstvennosti [Psychology of Responsibility]. Moscow, Librokom Publ., 2010. 248 p. (in Russian).
13. Dementiy Yu. A. Tipologiya i lichnostnyye osnovaniya [Typology and Personality Grounds]. Omsk, ОSU Publ., 2001. 192 p. (in Russian)
14. Evko Yu. A. Activation of Motivation to Achieve Success in Order to Form Professional Responsibility. Problemy vysshego obrazovaniya [Problems of Higher Education], 2015, no. 1, pp. 125–127 (in Russian).
15. Bespalova T. M. Specifi city of Psychological Structure of Responsibility as Professionally Important Personality Trait in Military Personnel. Vestnik RUDN. Psikhologiya i pedagogika [RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics], 2012, no. 3, pp. 107–111 (in Russian).
16. Semenova G. V. Proyavleniye otvetstvennosti lichnosti v kontekste zhiznennykh situatsiy [Manifestation of Personal Responsibility in Context of Life Situations]. Autoref. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Psychol.). St. Petersburg, 2007. 21 p. (in Russian).
17. Tsaran A. A. Formirovaniye nravstvennykh otnosheniy budushchikh menedzherov kak pedagogicheskoye usloviye ikh nravstvennogo samoopredeleniya [Formation of Future Managers’ Moral Relations as Pedagogical Condition of Their Moral Self-Determination]. Autoref. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Psychol.). Togliatti, 2014. 22 p. (in Russian).
18. Kon I. S. V poiskakh sebya. Lichnost’ i eye samosoznaniye [Looking for yourself. Personality and its Self-Consciousness]. Мoscow, Politizdat Publ., 1984. 195 p. (in Russian).
19. Gerasimova O. Yu. Will as Manifestation of Energy. Vestnik OGU [Vestnik the Orenburg State University], 2010, no. 7 (113), pp. 118–122 (in Russian).
20. Kunitsyna S. M. Model of Formation of Students’ Responsibility in Holistic Educational Process of Pedagogical University. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Vestnik of Nekrasov Kostroma State University], 2009, no. 4, pp. 450–454 (in Russian).

На сайте журнала 30.03.2023 запланированы технические работы. В это время сайт может быть недоступен. С уважением, администрация сайта.