Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology

Izvestiya of Saratov University.

ISSN 2304-9790 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9013 (Online)


For citation:

Gainutdinova I. R. Analysis of the effectiveness of instructional recommendations for forming practical skills and abilities in adolescents. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2021, vol. 10, iss. 1, pp. 79-85. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2021-10-1-79-85

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 101)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
371.38

Analysis of the effectiveness of instructional recommendations for forming practical skills and abilities in adolescents

Autors: 
Gainutdinova Irina R., Saratov State Technical University named after Gagarin Yu. A.
Abstract: 

Lessons for forming practical skills and abilities are significant in the educational process. A laboratory lesson, as the main type of lessons for forming practical skills and abilities, is linked to a number of difficulties in organizing effective work of adolescent schoolchildren. The purpose of the study is to experimentally check the effectiveness of the developed instructional recommendations for forming practical skills and abilities in adolescents, taking into account age and gender role characteristics. The hypothesis of the study is: the developed instructional recommendations increase the effectiveness of development of practical skills and abilities in adolescent schoolchildren. The study substantiates the necessity of using the knowledge of age and gender-role characteristics of schoolchildren by a teacher in organizing and conducting laboratory lessons. The study also highlights the methodological research principles, i.e. individually differentiated and holistic approach to teaching schoolchildren. The study is carried out on a sample of 8th grade students (N = 52, aged from 13 to 14 years; experimental group (n = 25), control group (n = 27)) of the educational institution “Gymnasium No. 1” in Saratov. We carried out inter-group analysis of average grade points of schoolchildren for laboratory works in physics, chemistry and biology during the 2018-2019 academic year using the Mann – Whitney U test. It showed that the developed instructional recommendations contribute to an increase in the effectiveness of the formation of practical skills and abilities in adolescents, while not significantly affecting the average grade points. The applied aspect of the problem under study can be implemented in the development of a complex of pedagogical strategies that ensure the effectiveness of the formation of practical skills and abilities in adolescent schoolchildren during laboratory lessons

Reference: 
  1. Ivanova T. V., Brovkina E. T., Kalinova G. S. Obshchaya metodika obucheniya biologii v shkole [General Method of Teaching Biology at School]. Moscow, Drofa Publ., 2016. 271 p. (in Russian).
  2. Bozhovich L. I. Lichnost’ i yeye formirovanie v detskom vozraste [Personality and Its Formation in Childhood]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2008. 400 p. (in Russian).
  3. Antsupov A. Ya. Profi laktika konfl iktov v shkol’nom kollektive [Prevention of Confl icts in the School Team]. Moscow, Vlados Publ., 2003. 208 p. (in Russian).
  4. Volkov B. S. Psikhologiya podrostkovogo vozrasta. [Psychology of Adolescence]. Moscow, KnoRus Publ., 2016. 266 p. (in Russian).
  5. Smith H. A. Teaching Adolescents: Educational Psychology as a Science of Signs. Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2007. 400 р. Available at: http://www. amazon. com/Teaching-Adolescents-Educational-PsychologyCommunication/dp/0802090990 (accessed 15 August 2020).
  6. Frolova O. V. The specifi cs of the development of the teenagers and young persons. Kazan State Power Engineering University Bulletin, 2009, no. 1 (1), pp. 59–68 (in Russian).
  7. Kolesov D. B. Biologiya i psikhologiya pola [Biology and Psychology of Sex]. Moscow, Flinta Publ., 2000. 176 p. (in Russian)
  8. Abramova V. E. Psikhicheskaya regulyatsiya nravstvenno-delovogo obshcheniya podrostkov [Psychic regulation of moral and business communication of adolescents]. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Psychol.). Moscow, 2001. 29 p. (in Russian) .
  9. Kletsina I. S., Ioffe E. V. Psikhologiya gendernykh otnosheniy [Psychology of Gender Relations]. St. Petersburg, Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy pedagogicheskiy universitet im. A. I. Gertsena, 2018. 244 p. (in Russian).
  10. Egorova M. S., Shlyakhta N. F. Gender differeces in the structure of attention properties in adolescents. Novye issledovaniya v psikhologii, 1987, no. 2, pp. 33–36 (in Russian).
  11. Radina N. K., Tereshenkova E. Yu. Developmental and socio-cultural aspects of gender socialization in adolescents. Voprosy Psychologii, 2011, no. 5, pp. 49–59 (in Russian).
  12. Gurian M. Boys and Girls Learn Differently: A Guide for Teachers and Parents. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2001. 400 p.
  13. Sergeeva I. A. Gender differences in voluntary attention and memory of older preschoolers. In: A. A. Krylov, ed. Psikhologiya XXI veka: Tezisy mezhdunarodnoy mezhvuzovskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii studentov i aspirantov [Psychology of the XXI Century: Abstracts of the International Interuniversity Scientifi c and Practical Conference of Students and Graduate Students]. St. Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo St.-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 2001, pp. 251–252 (in Russian).
  14. Stolyarchuk L. I. Pedagogic preventive measures of disadaptation of a teenager: gender approach. Izvestia of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University. Series Pedagogics, 2012, no. 4 (68), pp. 33–37 (in Russian).
  15. Kukushin V. S. Teoriya i metodika obucheniya [Theory and Teaching Methods]. Rostov on Don, Feniks Publ., 2005. 474 p. (in Russian).
  16. Krayevskiy V. V. Osnovy obucheniya: didaktika i me - todika [Fundamentals of Teaching: Didactics and Methods]. Moscow, Academia Publ., 2007. 346 p. (in Russian).
  17. Galyamova E. M., Vygonov V. V., Pershina Zh. A. Metodika obucheniya produktivnym vidam deyatel’nosti s praktikumom [Methods of Teaching Productive Activities with a Workshop]. Moscow, Academia Publ., 2018. 173 p. (in Russian).
  18. Titova I. M. Obuchenie khimii. Psikhologo-metodicheskiy podkhod [Teaching Chemistry. Psychological and Methodological Approach]. St. Petersburg, Karo Publ., 2002. 204 p. (in Russian).
  19. Kamenetskiy N. S., Purysheva N. E., Vazheevskaya N. E. Teoriya i metodika obucheniya fi zike [Theory and Methods of Teaching Physics]. Moscow, Academia Publ., 2000. 367 p. (in Russian).
  20. Levchenko A. L. The formation of laboratory practice as a form of biology teaching. The Scientifi c Opinion, 2019, no. 10, pp. 85–94 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25807/PBH.22224378.2019.10.85.94
Received: 
13.10.2020
Accepted: 
13.12.2020
Published: 
31.03.2021