For citation:
Vasilieva I. V. Theoretical Contradictions in the Defining. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2015, vol. 4, iss. 1, pp. 27-29. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2015-4-1-27-29
Theoretical Contradictions in the Defining
The article describes theoretical inconsistencies in defining the psychological mechanisms of intuition. The research points out the approach that regards intuition as a complex functioning, and the other cognitive process considering intuition as the means to obtain «direct knowledge», which is beyond the rationally explicable availability of information. The authors outline the difficulties professionals of different areas face in the course of studying intuitional phenomena (psychologists, psycho-physiologists).
1. Kahneman D., Tversky А. Racionalnyi vibor, cennosty, freimy (Rational choice, values and frames). Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal (Psychological Journal), 2003. Vol. 24, no. 4. pp. 31-42 (in Russian).
2. Ponomarev J. A. Psikhologiya tvorchestva (Psychology of creativity). ^^scow, 1976. 303 р. (in Russian).
3. Berry D., Broadbent D. Implicit learning in the control of complex systems. Complex problem solving. Eds. P. Frensch, J. Funke. 1995, pp. 131-150.
4. Naumenko E. A., Vasil'eva I. V. Intuitsionnye osnovy effektivnoy deyatel'nosti sledovateley (Intuitional basics of investigators' effective activity). Tyumen', 2008. 203 p. (in Russian).
5. McCraty R. Influence of cardiac afferent input on heartbrain synchronization and cognitive performance. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2002, vol. 45 (1-2), pp.72-73.
6. Mossbridge J. A., Tressoldi P., Utts J., Ives J. A., Radin D., Jonas W. B. Predicting the unpredictable: critical analysis and practical implications of predictive anticipatory activity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2014, no. 8. Available at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/ fnhum.2014.00146/full/ (accessed 25 September 2014).