Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology

Izvestiya of Saratov University.

ISSN 2304-9790 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9013 (Online)


For citation:

Chernov A. U., Zinovieva D. M., Vodopianova N. E., Fomina O. O. Structure and Types of Cognitive Schemes of the Psychological Well-Being. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2020, vol. 9, iss. 1, pp. 33-43. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2020-9-1-33-43

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 270)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
316.6:159.9

Structure and Types of Cognitive Schemes of the Psychological Well-Being

Autors: 
Chernov Alexander U., Volgograd State University
Zinovieva Dina M., Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Service (Volgograd Branch)
Vodopianova Natalia E., Saint Petersburg University
Fomina Olga O., Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Service (Volgograd Branch)
Abstract: 

The paper presents the results of theoretical and empirical study of psychological well-being from a cognitive point of view, as a mental representation, including the experience of responding to the diverse dynamic challenges of a social situation. We suggested that psychological well-being is a mental schema. We presented the results of the empirical study performed on a sample (N = 111, aged from 18 to 40 years old), divided into two age groups: 18–25 years old (n = 55) and 26–40 years old (n = 56), using adapted questionnaire by R. A. Steffenhagen and J. D. Burns, the diagnosing technique for subjective well-being of a person by R. M. Shamionov, T. V. Beskova, descriptive statistics, comparison of mean values (Student t-test) and regression analysis. The following research results are described in the paper: situational, spiritual, social formats of self-esteem are associated with various parameters of psychological well-being: they form a structural unity, interpreted as a cognitive schema of well-being. We differentiated “simple”, “complex closed” and “complex open” cognitive schemas which are concretized as “contextual”, “procedural” and “compensatory” types of cognitive schemas in their content. We established the prevalence of structurally “simple” and “contextual” cognitive schemas in their content in the younger age group with a gradual strengthening of the role of “complex open” “compensatory” schemas in the older age group. The findings of the research can be applied when developing programs of psychological and pedagogical support of students

Reference: 

1. Aver’yanova O. Yu., Shavshasheva L. V. Psychological well-being of the individual. In: Integratsiya nauki i obrazovaniya v 21 veke: psikhologiya, pedagogika, defektologiya: materialy Vseros. s mezhdunar. uchastiem nauch.-prakt. konf. (Saransk, 3‒4 dekabrya 2015). SanktPeterburg, Sankt-Peterburgskiy gosudarstvennyy institut psikhologii i sotsial’noy raboty, 2016, pp. 10‒15 (in Russian).
2. Bessonova Yu. V. On the structure of psychological wellbeing. In: Psikhologicheskoe blagopoluchie lichnosti v sovremennom obrazovatel’nom prostranstve: sb. statey [Psychological Well-being of a Person in the Modern Educational Framework: Collection of Papers]. Compl. Yu. V. Bratchikova. Ekaterinburg, Ural State Pedagogical University, 2013, pp. 30‒35 (in Russian).
3. Bocharova E. E., Tarasova L. E. Subjective Well-being and Social Activity of the Person in Different Social and Cultural Conditions. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, 2012, no. 8 (16). Available at: https://elibrary.ru/contentsasp (accessed 14 January 2019) (in Russian).
4. Shamionov R. M. Psikhologiya sub”ektivnogo blagopoluchiya lichnosti [Psychology of Subjective Wellbeing of the Person]. Saratov, Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta, 2004. 180 p. (in Russian).
5. Dasgupta P. Human Well-Being and the Natural Environment. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001. 305 p.
6. Diener E., Emmons R. A., Larsen R. J. Griffi n S. The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 71‒75.
7. Bocharova E. E. On the issue of internal determinants of a person’s subjective well-being. Izvestiya Penzenskogo gos. ped. un-ta imeni V. G. Belinskogo, 2008, no. 10, pp. 226‒231 (in Russian).
8. Budaeva A. Yu., Khalifaeva O. A. Psikhologicheskoe blagopoluchie kak odin iz pokazateley psikhologicheskogo zdorov’ya lichnosti [Psychological well-being as one of the indicators of a person’s psychological health] In: Psikhologicheskoe zdorov’e cheloveka: zhiznennyy resurs i zhiznennyy potentsial: materialy mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. [Psychological Health of a Person: Proceedings of the International Scientifi c and Practical Conference] (Krasnoyarsk, 28‒29 noyabrya 2014 g). Krasnoyarsk, 2014, pp. 120‒127 (in Russian).
9. Kostina S. S., Osin E. N. Ideas of a happy and meaningful life: are they related to psychological well-being? Paradigma: fi losofsko-kul’turologicheskiy al’manakh [Paradigm: Philosophical and Culturological Almanac], 2012, vol. 3, pp. 179‒188 (in Russian).
10. Badhwar N. K. Objectivity and Subjectivity in Theories of Well-Being. Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly, 2004, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 30‒38.
11. Rice T. W., Steele B. J. Subjective well-being and culture across time and space. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2004, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 633‒647.
12. Schafer R. B. Relationships and Well-Being over the Life Stages. New York, Praeger, 1991. 180 p.
13. Tomer J. F. Human Well-Being: A New Approach Based on Overall and Ordinary Functionings. Review of Social Economy, 2002, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 23‒28.
14. Kulikov L. V. Health and subjective well-being. In: Psikhologiya zdorov’ya [Psychology of Health]. Ed. G. S. Nikiforov. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2000, pp. 33‒45 (in Russian).
15. Pavlotskaya Ya. I. Socio-Psychological Analysis of the Levels and Types of Well-Being Personal. Sov remennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Current Issues of Science and Education], 2015, no. 1, pt. 1, pp. 1‒9 (in Russian).
16. Uryvaev V. A., Petrov D. V., Shutov A. S., Petrova G. D., Tarasova A. A. Dynamics of students’ subjective wellbeing in the learning process: a longitudinal study. Psikhologiya i meditsina: puti poiska optimal’nogo vzaimodeystviya: materialy XI mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. [Psychology and Medicine: the search for optimal interaction: proceedings of the XI International Scientifi c and Practical Conference]. Ryazan', RyazGMU, 2011, pp. 89‒94 (in Russian).
17. Gilibert D., Cambon L. Paradigms of the Sociocognitive Approach. A Sociocognitive Approach to Social Norms. Ed. N. Dubois. London, Routledge, 2003, pp. 38‒69.
18. Huang J. Emotional Intelligence and Subjective WellBeing: Altruistic Behavior as a Mediator. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 2018, vol. 46, iss. 5, pp. 749‒762.
19. King K. A. Self-Concept and Self-Esteem: A Clarifi cation of Terms. Contributors. Journal of School Health, 1997, vol. 67, iss. 2, pp. 68‒74.
20. Steffenhagen R. A., Burns J. D. Social Dynamics of SelfEsteem: Theory to Therapy. New York, Praeger, 1987. 245 p.
21. Sokolova M. V. Shkala sub”ektivnogo blagopoluchiya [The Scale of Subjective Well-Being]. Yaroslavl’, NPTs "Psikhodiagnostika", 1996. 14 p. (in Russian).
22. Freeman R. B. Work and Well-Being: Introduction. National Institute Economic Review, 2009, no. 209, pp. 70‒81.
23. Luhmann M., Hofmann W., Eid M., Lucas R. E. Subjective Well-Being and Adaptation to Life Events: A MetaAnalysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2012, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 592‒615.
24. Orlova D. G. Psychological and subjective well-being: definition, structure and research (review of current publications). Vestnik PGGPU. Ser. 1. Psikhologicheskie i pedagogicheskie nauki [Vestnik PSHPU. Series 1. Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences], 2015, iss. 1, pp. 28‒36 (in Russian).
25. Haybron D. M. On Being Happy or Unhappy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2005, vol. 71, iss. 2, pp. 287‒317.
26. Shamionov R. M. Ethnocultural factors of the subjective well-being of the person. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 2014, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 68–81 (in Russian).
27. Green B. Understand Schema, Understand Difference. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 2010, vol. 37, iss. 2, pp. 133‒148.
28. Mandler J. M. Stories, Scripts, and Scenes: Aspects of Schema Theory. Hillsdale, NJ., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1984. 144 p.
29. Markus H. Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 63–78.
30. Bartlett F. C. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambrige, UK, Cambridge University Press, 1932. 317 p.
31. Neisser U. Cognition and Reality. San Francisco, W. H. Freeman, 1976. 230 p.
32. Turner R. M. Adaptive Reasoning for Real-World Problems: A Schema-Based Approach. Hillsdale, NJ., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1994. 260 p.
33. Landau, R. J., Goldfried M. R. The assessment of schemata: A unifying framework for cognitive, behavioral, and traditional assessment. In: Assessment strategies for cognitive-behavioral interventions. Eds. P. C. Kendall, S. D. Hollon. New York, Academic Press, 1981, pp. 363‒399.
34. Kumar N. Self-Esteem and Its Impact on Performance. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 2017, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 142‒157.
35. Zaff J. F., Hair E.C. Positive Development of the Self: Self-Concept, Self-Esteem, and Identity. In: WellBeing: Positive Development across the Life Cours. Ed. M. H. Bornstein. Mahwah, NJ, Psychology Press, 2003, pp. 235‒253.
36. Shamionov R. M., Beskova T. V. Methods of diagnosis of subjective well-being of the individual. Journal Editorial Board, 2018, vol. 11, no. 60, pp. 8‒16 (in Russian).

Published: 
03.04.2020