Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology

Izvestiya of Saratov University.

ISSN 2304-9790 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9013 (Online)


For citation:

Tolochek V. A. Social complementary dyads and the subject’s resources of success. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2022, vol. 11, iss. 2, pp. 120-132. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2022-11-2-120-132

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 24)
Полный текст в формате PDF(En):
(downloads: 18)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
159.9:316.6

Social complementary dyads and the subject’s resources of success

Autors: 
Tolochek Vladimir A., Institute of Psychology
Abstract: 

The purpose of the article is to describe the phenomenon of “social complementary dyads”. Dyads are considered as small social groups (micro groups) being the main forms of people’s organization, of culture transfer, and of the development of special knowledge within the professional sphere; as social structures that ensure the reliability and eff ectiveness of human activity. The author highlighted and analysed the features of the following social complementary dyads (SCD): ‘educator – educated’, ‘teacher – school student’, ‘lecturer – university student’, ‘head – subordinate’, ‘leader – follower’, etc. It is believed that varieties of social dyads as the main forms of transmitting social experience of mankind in various professional spheres (‘doctor – patient’, ‘coach – athlete’, ‘writer – reader’, ‘consultant – customer’, etc.) have historically been increasing. The research presents problematic aspects and diffi culties in studying dyads. Hypotheses: 1) the phenomenon of “social complementary dyads” (SCD) is a historically evolving social and psychological phenomenon; 2) social success of the subjects being the partners of a dyad may change in the process of their functioning; 3) purposeful development of unique and specifi c dyads is possible along with spontaneously developed SCD. The study proposes the typology and describes the features of diff erent social dyads: 1) complementary social dyads (SCD); 2) supportive social formations; 3) professional complex dyads; 4) professional creative dyads; 5) related dyads; 6) spontaneous dyads; 7) destructive (parasitic, exploitative) dyads; 8) asocial dyads. The article discusses correlation between the phenomenon of a ‘dyad’ and the problem of resources (intra-subject, inter-subject and extra-subject), socio-psychological and psychological mechanisms of actualization, formation and development of resources. The author has identifi ed a number of research issues, which have been suffi ciently developed in psychology to date and refl ect the key features of resources; the issues which can be considered as prototypes for development (problems of integral human individuality; cognitive resources, professional development of the subject, complementarity of qualities of the subjects of joint activity).

Reference: 
  1. Конецкий В. В. Морские повести и рассказы. СПб. ; М. : Азбука ; Азбука-Аттикус, 2021. 736 с.
  2. Толочек В. А. Проблема стилей в психологии: историко-теоретический анализ. М. : Изд-во «Институт психологии РАН», 2013. 318 с.
  3. Панов В. И. Теоретическое обоснование экопсихологической (онтологической) модели становления субъектности // Панов В. И., Зотова С. Л., Лидская Э. В., Мдивани М. О., Плаксина И. В., Сараева Н. М., Хисамбеев Ш. Р. Становление субъектности учащегося и педагога: экопсихологическая модель / под ред. В. И. Панова. М. ; СПб. : Нестор-История, 2018. С. 61‒88.
  4. Панов В. И. Предисловие от редактора // Панов В. И., Зотова С. Л., Лидская Э. В., Мдивани М. О., Плаксина И. В., Сараева Н. М., Хисамбеев Ш. Р. Становление субъектности учащегося и педагога: экопсихологическая модель / под ред. В. И. Панова. М. ; СПб. : Нестор-История, 2018. С. 11‒15.
  5. Обозов Н. Н. Межличностные отношения. Л. : Изд-во ЛГУ, 1979. 149 с.
  6. Парыгин Б. Д. Основы социально-психологической теории. М. : Мысль, 1971. 348 С.
  7. Парыгин Б. Д. Социальная психология. СПб. : СПбГУП, 2003. 616 с.
  8. Ломов Б. Ф. Методологические и теоретические проблемы психологии. М. : Наука, 1984. 444 с.
  9. Андреева Г. М. Социальная психология. М. : Аспект Пресс, 2003. 364 с.
  10. Бодалев А. А. Психология общения. М. : Институт практической психологии ; Воронеж : МОДЭК, 1996. 256 с.
  11. Карпова Н. Л. Общение: структура и модель процесса // Психология общения: энциклопедический словарь / под общ. ред. А. А. Бодалева. М. : КогитоЦентр, 2011. С. 81‒82. 12. Панферов В. Н. Классификация функций человека как субъекта общения // Психологический журнал. 1987. Т. 8, № 4. С. 51–60.
  12. Солдатова Г. У., Гасимов А. Ф. Разработка и апробация методики оценки переговорного стиля (МОПС) // Экспериментальная психология. 2019. Т. 12, № 3. С. 92‒104. https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy. 2019120308
  13. Куницына В. Н., Казаринова Н. В., Погольша В. М. Межличностное общение. СПб. : Питер, 2001. 544 с.
  14. Eagly A. H., Karau S. J., Makhijani M. G. Gender and effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analytic // Psychological Bulletin. 1995. Vol. 117, № 1. P. 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.125
  15. Feingold A. Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis // Psychological Bulletin. 1994. Vol. 116, № 3. P. 429–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.429
  16. Ragins B., Sundstrom E. Gender and power in organizations: A longitudinal perspective // Psychological Bulletin. 1989. Vol. 105, № 1. P. 51–88. https://doi. org/10.1037/00332909.105.1.51
  17. Roberts T.-A. Gender and infl uence of evaluations on self-assessments in achievement setting // Psychological Bulletin. 1991. Vol. 109, № 2. P. 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.297
Received: 
01.02.2022
Accepted: 
10.03.2022
Published: 
30.06.2022
Short text (in English):
(downloads: 14)