Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology

Izvestiya of Saratov University.

ISSN 2304-9790 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9013 (Online)

For citation:

Vlasova G. I., Turchin A. S. Semiotic and Symbolic Means in the Life of Preschool Children. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2017, vol. 6, iss. 3, pp. 197-203. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2017-6-3-197-203

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 94)
Article type: 

Semiotic and Symbolic Means in the Life of Preschool Children

Vlasova Galina I., St. Petersburg Academy of Postgraduate Teacher Education
Turchin Anatoly S., Saint-Petersburg Military Institute of Internal Troops of the Interior Ministry

The results of theoretical analysis of the problem of semiotic (symbolic) mediation of development of preschool children psychology in the process of mastering the speech activity. It is mentioned that being a semiotic system, speech helps children to take control of their behavior: it becomes controlled (perceived) and organized (self-developed in the context of the situation). The goal of the research presented in this article is psychological justification of selection of variable part of the pre-school program of educational organization, associated with the implementation of the cultural-historical approach, according to which the idea of semiotic mediation of children activities is the key to understanding development of children psychology. It is mentioned that complete adoption of activities with semantic means requires the formation of its content according to a program corresponding to the complexity age. Taking into consideration the adoption of the Federal State Educational Standard of preschool education, the pedagogical stuff of preschool educational organizations can choose one of the innovative programs designed by the author (“Childhood”, “Roots”, “Rainbow” etc.) as a variable part of the basic educational program. In this regard, it is important that educators have knowledge of the semiotic (symbolic) function as the basis for such preschool activities such as play, communication, speech, artistic activity etc. The “Development” program, which has proved itself in preschool education in the last twenty years, corresponds to the task of improving the quality of preschool education.


1. Zinchenko V. P. Zhivoe Znanie. Psikhologicheskaya pedagogika: materialy k kursu lektsiy: v 2 ch. (Alive Knowledge. Psychological pedagogy: materials for lectures course in 2 parts). 2nd ed. Samara, 1998. Part 1. 296 p. (in Russian).

2. Turchin A. S. Akmepsikhologiya razvitiya sub”ekta obrazovaniya v deyatel’nosti so znakovo-simvolicheskimi sredstvami (Eco-psychology of education subject’s development in activities with sign-symbolic means). Moscow; Kostroma, 2011. 318 p. (in Russian).

3. Vygotskiy L. S. Orudie i znak v razvitii rebenka (Cannon and sign in child’s development). Vygotskiy L. S. Sobr. soch.: v 6 t. (Vygotskiy L. S The collected works in 6 vol.). Moscow, 1984, vol. 6, pp. 6–90 (in Russian).

4. Vygotskiy L. S. Myshlenie i rech (Thinking and speech). Vygotskiy L. S. Sobr. soch.: v 6 t. (Vygotskiy L. S. The collected works in 6 vol.). Moscow, 1982, vol. 2, pp. 5–361 (in Russian).

5. Leont’ev A. N. Deyatel’nost’. Soznanie. Lichnost’ (Activity. Consciousness. Personality). 2nd ed. Moscow, 1977. 304 p. (in Russian)

6. Leont’ev D. A. Psikhologiya smysla: priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyslovoy real’nosti: ucheb. posobie dlya stud. vuzov (Psychology of sense: Nature, structure and dynamics of semantic reality: the textbook for university students). 2nd ed. Moscow, 2003. 486 p. (in Russian).

7. Losev A. F. Znak. Simvol. Mif (Sign. Symbol. Myth). Moscow, 1982. 478 p. (in Russian)

8. Fridman L. M. Naglyadnost’ i modelirovanie v obuchenii (Visualization and simulation in teaching). Moscow, 1984. 80 p. (in Russian).

9. Bruner J. S. The ontogenesis of speech acts. Journal of Child Language, 1975, no. 2, pp. 1–19 (in Russian).

10. Vygotskiy L. S. Voobrazhenie i tvorchestvo v detskom vozraste (Imagination and creativity in childhood). 3rd ed. Moscow, 1991. 93 p. (in Russian).

11. Petrova E. A. Zhesty v pedagogicheskom protsesse (Gestures in pedagogical process). Moscow, 1998. 228 p. (in Russian).

12. Romanov I. V., Turchin A. S. Osobennosti rassmotreniya protsessa obucheniya kak upravlyaemogo semiozisa (Peculiarities of consideration of learning process as managed semiosis). Nauchnoe mnenie: Pedagogicheskie, psikhologicheskie i filosofskie nauki (The Scientific Opinion: pedagogical, psychological and philosophic sciences), 2016, no. 14, pp. 94–97 (in Russian).

13. Aydarova L. I. Psikhologicheskie problemy obucheniya mladshikh shkol’nikov russkomu yazyku (Psychological problems of teaching younger schoolchildren to Russian language). Moscow, 1978. 144 p. (in Russian).

14. Glotova G. A. Chelovek i znak: semiotiko-psikhologicheskie aspekty ontogeneza cheloveka (Man and sign: semiotic-psychological aspects of human ontogenesis). Sverdlovsk, 1990. 256 p. (in Russian).

15. Isenina E. I. Doslovesnyy period razvitiya rechi u detey (Previous to verbal period of children’ speech development). Saratov, 1986. 164 p. (in Russian).

16. Papi F., Papi Zh. Deti i grafy. Obuchenie detey shestiletnego vozrasta matematicheskim ponyatiyam (Children and graphs. Training six-age children for mathematical concepts). Moscow, 1974. 192 p. (in Russian, trans. from French).

17. Salmina N. G. Vidy i funktsii materializatsii v obuchenii (Types and functions of materialization in training). Moscow, 1981. 136 p. (in Russian).

18. Salmina N. G. Znak i simvol v obuchenii (Sign and symbol in training). Moscow, 1988. 288 p. (in Russian).

19. Karpova S. N., Kolobova I. N. Osobennosti orientirovki na slovo u detey (Features of children’ orientation onto word). Moscow, 1979. 166 p. (in Russian).