Cite this article as:

Tolochek V. A. Professional Mentality as a Dynamic Structure. Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2020, vol. 9, iss. 4, pp. 338-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2020-9-4-338-349


UDC: 
159.9:316.6
Language: 
Russian

Professional Mentality as a Dynamic Structure

Abstract: 

The article presents methodology and methods of field study on the example of studying the professional mentality (PM). Purpose of the study: Analysis of typical conditions of scientific research work (SRW), connections between methods, recorded facts and properties of psychological objects. Methods: analysis of literary sources; observation, questionnaires, expert polls, psychodiagnostics, parametric methods of statistics. Hypotheses: 1. Research methods, revealed scientific facts, described properties of psychological objects are in a relationship of mutual conditioning. 2. Attention to artifacts allows us to develop constructive options for further study of psychological objects. Study base: a) civil servants (93 people); b) private security guards (more than 200 people). The meta-problem of the present study (the methodology and methods of field study) is viewed on the example of observation and study of behavior and activities of the subjects in different social situations. We demonstrated that the maximum differentiation of aspects of the working conditions of civil servants (up to the “incredible” and atypical 11-point scale of intervals), awareness of the socio-demographic and work-related aspects of the subjects, the use of a set of parametric methods of statistics made it possible to satisfactorily solve SRW tasks even in situations when respondents resisted. The study of professional mentality (PM) using two models (professional spheres opposite in many respects, which set two “poles” of their possible characteristics) allows us to identify both similar and different features of behavior, relationships, activities and interaction of people. It is stated: 1) The constructive approach is the joint study of the properties of at least two psychological objects 2) In the study of complex psychological objects, it is advisable to use a differential approach and complexes of methods of parametric statistics. 

References
  1. Gostev A. A. Problem of Russian Mentality in Light of the Russian Orthodox Christian Tradition. In: A. L. Zhuravlyov, V. A. Kol’tsova, Yu. N. Oleynik, total eds. The History of Russian and World Psychological Thought: To Value the Past, to Love the Present, to Believe in the Future: materials of International conference on the history of psychology. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Publ., 2010, p. 22–32 (in Russian).
  2. Dodonov R. A. Etnicheskaya mental’nost’: opyt sotsial’nofi losofskogo issledovaniya [Ethnic Mentality: the Experience of Socio-Philosophical Research]. Zaporozh’ye, RA «Tandem-U» Publ., 1998. 191 p. (in Russian).
  3. Dubov I. G. Fenomen mentaliteta [The Phenomenon of Mentality]. Voprosy Psychologii, 1993, no. 5, pp. 20–29. (in Russian).
  4. Zhuravlev A. L., Ushakov D. V., Yurevich A. V. Mentality, society and “Homo psychosocialis” (response to the participants of the discussion). Psychological Journal, 2017, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 107–112 (in Russian).
  5. Kharitonova E. V. Relations of “mentality” concepts. In: V. A. Kol’tsova, E. V. Kharitonova, total eds. Istoriogenez i sovremennoye sostoyaniye rossiyskogo mentaliteta [Historiogenesis and the current state of Russian mentality]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Publ., 2015, pp. 226–239 (in Russian).
  6. Yurevich A. V. Basic components of national mentality. In: V. A. Kol’tsova, E. V. Kharitonova, total eds. Istoriogenez i sovremennoye sostoyaniye rossiyskogo mentaliteta [Historiogenesis and the current state of Russian mentality]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Publ., 2015, pp. 240–261 (in Russian).
  7. Diomin A. N. Lichnost’ v krizise zanyatosti: strategii i mekhanizmy preodoleniya krizisa [Personality in the employment crisis: strategies and mechanisms of crisis overcoming]. Krasnodar, Kubanskiy gos. un-t Publ., 2004. 315 p. (in Russian).
  8. Druzhilov S. A. Psikhologiya professionalizma. Inzhenerno-psikhologicheskiy podkhod [Psychology of professionalism. Engineering and psychological approach]. Khar’kov, Humanitarian centre Publ., 2011. 296 p. (in Russian).
  9. Pryazhnikov N. S., Pryazhnikova E. Yu. Psikhologiya truda i chelovecheskogo dostoinstva [Psychology of labor and human dignity]. Moscow, Academia Publ., 2001. 480 p. (in Russian).
  10. Standing G. Prekariat: novyy opasnyy klass [The Prekariat: the New Dangerous Class]. Moscow, Ad Marginem Press Publ., 2014. 328 p. (in Russian, trans. from English).
  11. Kharitonova Evg. V. Sotsial’no-professional’naya vostrebovannost’ lichnosti na etapakh zhiznennogo I professional’nogo puti [Social and professional demand for personality at the stages of life and professional path]. Krasnodar, Kubanskiy gos. un-t Publ.; Parabellum Publ., 2011. 382 p. (in Russian).
  12. Tolochek V. A. Psikhologiya truda [Psychology of labor]. 3rd ed. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2019. 480 p. (in Russian).
  13. Petrovskiy A. V., Yaroshevskiy M. G., total eds. Psikhologiya. Slovar’ [Psychology. Dictionary]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1990. 494 p. (in Russian).
  14. Tolochek V. A. Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya i stili professional’noy deyatel’nosti gosudarstvennykh sluzhashchikh [Organizational psychology and professional styles of civil servants]. Moscow, RAGS Publ., 2003. 159 p. (in Russian).
  15. Tolochek V. A. Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya: upravlenie personalom CHOP i SB [Organizational psychology: HR management]. Moscow, Mir bezopasnosti Publ., 2004. 176 p. (in Russian).
  16. Moskalenko O. V. Akmeologiya professional’noy kar’ery lichnosti [Acmeology of a person’s professional career]. Moscow, RAGS Publ., 2007. 352 p. (in Russian).
Full text (in Russian):
(downloads: 16)
Short text (in English):
(downloads: 8)