Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology

Izvestiya of Saratov University.

ISSN 2304-9790 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9013 (Online)


For citation:

Prygin G. S. Peculiarities Manifestations of the «Analyticity – Syntheticity» Cognitive Style in the Typology of Subjective Regulation. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2016, vol. 5, iss. 3, pp. 227-231. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2016-5-3-227-231

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 142)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article

Peculiarities Manifestations of the «Analyticity – Syntheticity» Cognitive Style in the Typology of Subjective Regulation

Autors: 
Prygin Gennady S., Naberezhnye Chelny State Pedagogical University
Abstract: 

The paper aims at identifying characteristics of the manifestation of the «analyticity – syntheticity» cognitive style in the typology of subjective regulation. The study tested a hypothesis that people with the autonomous type of subjective regulation tend to have a synthetic cognitive style, while people with the dependent type of subjective regulation demonstrate an analytical cognitive style. The study sample included 100 employees of an insurance company, 25–50 years old, represented equally by males and females. As its diagnostic tools, the study used the author’s original technique of «autonomy – dependency» and the «analyticity –syntheticity» technique (as modified by V. Kolgi). It has been established that people with the autonomous type of subjective regulation distinguish significantly fewer groups (temp.= 10,40 with P ? 0,001) and more objects in the biggest group (temp.= 6,01 with P ? 0,01) than those of the dependent type. The practical significance of the study is that its results can be used by psychologists in designing individual psychological training programs aimed at building cognitive maturity.

Reference: 

1. Olport G. Stanovlenie lichnosti: izbr. tr. (Establishing of personality: Selectas). Moscow, 2002. 462 p. (in Russian, trans. from English).
2. Adler A. Ponyat’ prirodu cheloveka (To understand human nature). St.-Petersburg, 1997. 256 p. (in Russian, trans. from German).

3. Wittkin H. A. Perception of body position of the position visual fi eld. Washington, 1950. 276 p.
4. Gardner R.W. Personality organization in cognitive controls and intellectual abilities. Psychological Issues. Monograph 8. 1960, vol. 2, iss. 4, pp. 297‒323.
5. Klimov E. A. Individual’nyy stil’ deyatel’nosti v zavisimosti ot tipologicheskikh svoystv nervnoy sistemy (Individual style of activity depending on qualities of nervous system). Kazan, 1969. 278 p. (in Russian).
6. Merlin V. S. Psikhologiya individual’nosti (Psychology of individuality). Moscow ; Voronezh. 1996. 448 p. (in Russian).
7. Kholodnaya M. A. Kognitivnye stili. O prirode individual’nogo uma (Cognitive styles. About nature of individual intellect). St.-Petersburg, 2004. 384 p. (in Russian).
8. Prygin G. S. Lichnostno-tipologicheskie osobennosti sub”ektnoy regulyatsii deyatel’nosti: dis. … d-ra psikhol. nauk (Personal and typological features of subject’s regulation of activity: diss. … doct. of psychology). Moscow, 2006. 304 p. (in Russian).
9. Prygin G. S. Psikhologiya samostoyatel’nosti (Psychology of self-dependence. The monograph). Izhevsk; Naberezhnye Chelny, 2009. 408 p. (in Russian).
10. Kolga V.A. Differentsial’no-psikhologicheskoe issledovanie kognitivnogo stilya i obuchaemosti: diss. … kand. psikhol. nauk (Differential-psychological investigation of cognitive style and educability: diss. … cand. of psychology). Leningrad, 1976. 167 p. (in Russian).
11. Kholodnaya M. A. Psikhologiya intellekta. Paradoksy issledovaniya (Psychology of intellect. Paradoxes of investigation). St.-Petersburg, 2002. 272 p. (in Russian).

Published: 
24.09.2016
Short text (in English):
(downloads: 64)