Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology

Izvestiya of Saratov University.

ISSN 2304-9790 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9013 (Online)


For citation:

Fedorishin M. I., Perevozkina Y. M. Peculiar structural features of the metacognitive subsystem of mental models of interactions of servicemen of the National Guard of the Russian Federation. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2025, vol. 14, iss. 1, pp. 62-76. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2025-14-1-62-76, EDN: URLCLC

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 16)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
159. 9.07
EDN: 
URLCLC

Peculiar structural features of the metacognitive subsystem of mental models of interactions of servicemen of the National Guard of the Russian Federation

Autors: 
Fedorishin Michael Ivanovich, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University
Perevozkina Yulia M., Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University
Abstract: 

The relevance of the res earch is determined by a scientifi c terminological confusion regarding of the term “metacognitivism”, concerning the nature and interrelationships between various metacognitive parameters, which has become widespread in psychology. It also concerns professional experience of the National Guard of Russia servicemen, gained in the context of modern combat, and the infl uence of this experience on the structural organization of the metacognitive subsystem of mental models of military men. The research objective is to study the metasystem aspect of collective mental models of interaction of the servicemen of the Russian National Guard, including the analysis of the impact of combat experience on the structural organization of the metacognitive subsystem of mental models. The study hypothesizes that the structure of the metacognitive subsystem of the military men, who have combat experience in special military operation (SMO), will be more integrated compared to that of cadets. Participants: servicemen of the Russian National Guard, who participated in the special military operation (N = 161) aged from 21 to 43 (M = 33; SD = 1.57), third-year cadets (N = 340) aged from 20 to 24 (M = 22; SD =1.02) of Novosibirsk Military Institute of the National Guard Troops of the Russian Federation (Novosibirsk) (n =188), of Saint Petersburg Military Institute of the National Guard troops of the Russian Federation (St. Petersburg) (n = 152). Methods (tools): the Level of Refl exivity Questionnaire (A. V. Karpov, V. V. Ponomareva) was used to record the level of personal refl ection; the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (G. Schraw, R. Dennison adapted by A. V. Karpov, I. M. Skityaeva) was used to study the control of self–knowledge – metacognitive involvement in activity; the Self-assessment of Metacognitive Knowledge and Metacognitive Activity Questionnaire (M. M. Kashapov, Yu. V. Skvortsova) was used to analyze an individual’s metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive activity. Results: the comparative analysis of intercorrelation matrices of metacognitive parameters in the samples of the servicemen with combat experience gained during SMO and of the cadets (servicemen without combat experience) indicates their heterogeneity (the express χ2-Karpov method). The main conclus ions: the organizational structure of the metacognitive subsystem of the cadets is less coherent than that of the SMO participants, which demonstrates qualitative diff erences in the intercorrelation matrices between the metacognitive parameters. This refl ects the assimilation of professional experience among servicemen as the formation of a semblance of a mental model of interaction while performing military tasks in the context of modern combating. Practical Significance: the results obtained reveal the necessity to include in the professional training of cadets the study of cases aimed at solving simulated military and combat situations in order to activate and enhance the integration of structural components of the metacognitive subsystem of mental models.

Reference: 
  1. Alexander P. A., Schallert D. L., Hare V. C. Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge // Rev. Educ. 1991. Vol. 61. P. 315–343. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170635  
  2. Ball L. J., Threadgold E., Solowiej A., Marsh J. E. Can intrinsic and extrinsic metacognitive cues shield against distraction in problem solving? // Journal of Cognition. 2018. Vol. 1, iss. 1. P. 15–24. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.9  
  3. Bell R., Mieth L., Röer J. P., Buchner A. The metacognition of auditory distraction: Judgments about the effects of deviating and changing auditory distractors on cognitive performance // Memory and Cognition. 2021. Vol. 50, iss. 1. P. 160–173. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01200-2  
  4. Bell R., Komar G. F., Mieth L., Buchner A. Evidence of a metacognitive illusion in judgments about the effects of music on cognitive performance // Scientific Reports. 2018. Vol. 13, iss. 1. P. 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46169-x  
  5. Kattner F., Bryce D. Attentional control and metacognitive monitoring of the effects of different types of task-irrelevant sound on serial recall // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2022. Vol. 48, iss. 2. P. 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000982  
  6. Greely N. Reality testing and metacognition // Philosophical Psychology. 2024. P. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2024.2336588  
  7. Dessie E., Gebeyehu D., Eshetu F. Motivation, conceptual understanding, and critical thinking as correlates and predictors of metacognition in introductory physics // Cogent Education. 2024. Vol. 11, iss. 1. P. 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290114  
  8. Fleur D. S., Bredeweg B., van den Bos W. Metacognition: Ideas and insights from neuro-and educational sciences // Science of Learning. 2021. Vol. 13, iss. 6. P. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00089-5  
  9. Agadzhanyan K., Castel A. D. The effect of emotional valence and font size on metacognition and memory // Memory. 2024. Vol. 32, iss. 2. P. 252–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2024.2307919  
  10. Rummel J., Steindorf L., Wöstenfeld F. O., Steindorf L., Röer J. P. Effect of cognitive load on the perception of external and internal distractions and their relationship to attentional control // Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2024. Vol. 36, iss. 1. P. 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2023.2273576  
  11. Carpendale J., Cooper R. Conceptual understanding procedure to elicit metacognition with pre-service physics teachers // Physics Education. 2021. Vol. 56, iss. 2. Article 025008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/abc8fd  
  12. Tang Y., Wang X., Fang Y., Li J. The Antecedents and Consequences of Metacognitive Knowledge in Mathematics Learning: A Self-Determination Perspective // Frontiers in Psychology. 2021. Vol. 12. Article 754370. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754370  
  13. Перевозкина Ю. М., Федоришин М. И. Структурные компоненты коллективных ментальных моделей и методы их исследования // Направления и перспективы развития образования в военных институтах войск национальной гвардии Российской Федерации : сб. науч. ст. XIV Междунар. науч.-практ. конф. / под общ. ред. В. В. Косухина. Новосибирск : Новосибирский военный институт, 2022. С. 266–274.  
  14. Мекебаев Н. С., Перевозкина Ю. М., Федоришин М. И. Конфигурации коллективных ментальных моделей при решении служебно-боевых задач курсантами Росгвардии // Российский психологический журнал. 2022. Т. 19, № 2. С. 50–59. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2022.2.4, EDN: AVUPDY  
  15. Klimoski R., Mohammed S. Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? // Journal of Management. 1994. Vol. 50. P. 403–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639402000206  
  16. Mathieu J. E., Heffner T. S., Goodwin G. F., Salas E., Cannon-Bowers J. A. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance // Journal of Applied Psychology. 2000. Vol. 85, iss. 2. P. 273–283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273  
  17. Перевозкина Ю. М., Перевозкин С. Б., Федоришин М. И. Ментальные модели социального взаимодействия в служебной деятельности. Новосибирск : Новосибирский государственный педагогический университет, 2023. 226 c. EDN: ZIDFWF  
  18. Спирин А. В., Перевозкина Ю. М., Федоришин М. И. Критерии эффективности коллективных ментальных моделей // Методология современной психологии. 2023. № 17. С. 290–294. EDN: FTITFF  
  19. Орлова И. В. Тренинг профессионального самопознания: теория, диагностика и практика педагогической рефлексии. СПб. : Речь, 2006. 128 с. EDN: ASITNF  
  20. Карпов А. В., Скитяева И. М. Психология рефлексии. М. : Издательство «Институт психологии РАН», 2002. 320 с. EDN: ZIFRWF  
  21. Кашапов М. М., Скворцова Ю В. Самооценка метакогнитивной активности // Ярославский психологический вестник. 2005. № 14. С. 65–70.  
  22. Карпов А. В., Карпов А. А., Маркова Е. В. Психология принятия решения в управленческой деятельности. Метасистемный подход. М. : Издательский дом «Российской академии образования», 2016. 644 с. EDN: AVUPDY  
  23. Федоришин М. И., Спирин А. В., Чайковский П. В. Особенности индивидуальности личности курсантов с высоким уровнем саморегуляции человеческий фактор // Социальный психолог. 2019. № 1 (37). С. 423–435. EDN: SXWRYM  
  24. Спирин А. В., Перевозкина Ю. М., Федоришин М. И. Специфика структуры личностных особенностей в зависимости от типа темперамента у курсантов НВИ ВНГ РФ // Социальный психолог. 2020. № 2 (40). С. 295–303. EDN: ZIAFTQ  
  25. Федоришин М. И., Перевозкина Ю. М. Специфика выраженности способностей и когнитивных процессов в зависимости от доминирующей ролевой модели курсантов при решении служебно-боевых задач // Актуальные проблемы профессионально-практической психологии (Дьяченковские чтения – 2022) : сб. науч. тр. I Междунар. науч.-практ. конф. М. : Военный университет, 2022. С. 513–520. EDN: APARAG  
  26. Карпов А. В. Психология сознания: Метасистемный подход. М. : Издательский дом «Российской академии образования», 2011. 1088 с. EDN: QYBUYT  
  27. Azevedo R. Reflections on the field of metacognition: Issues, challenges, and opportunities // Metacognition and Learning. 2020. Vol. 15, iss. 2. P. 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09231-x  
  28. Zohar A., Ben-Ari G. Teachers’ knowledge and professional development for metacognitive instruction in the context of higher order thinking // Metacognition and Learning. 2022. Vol. 17, iss. 3. P. 855–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09310-1
Received: 
02.05.2024
Accepted: 
15.09.2024
Published: 
31.03.2025
Short text (in English):
(downloads: 10)