For citation:
Fedorishin M. I., Perevozkina Y. M. Peculiar structural features of the metacognitive subsystem of mental models of interactions of servicemen of the National Guard of the Russian Federation. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2025, vol. 14, iss. 1, pp. 62-76. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2025-14-1-62-76, EDN: URLCLC
Peculiar structural features of the metacognitive subsystem of mental models of interactions of servicemen of the National Guard of the Russian Federation
The relevance of the res earch is determined by a scientifi c terminological confusion regarding of the term “metacognitivism”, concerning the nature and interrelationships between various metacognitive parameters, which has become widespread in psychology. It also concerns professional experience of the National Guard of Russia servicemen, gained in the context of modern combat, and the infl uence of this experience on the structural organization of the metacognitive subsystem of mental models of military men. The research objective is to study the metasystem aspect of collective mental models of interaction of the servicemen of the Russian National Guard, including the analysis of the impact of combat experience on the structural organization of the metacognitive subsystem of mental models. The study hypothesizes that the structure of the metacognitive subsystem of the military men, who have combat experience in special military operation (SMO), will be more integrated compared to that of cadets. Participants: servicemen of the Russian National Guard, who participated in the special military operation (N = 161) aged from 21 to 43 (M = 33; SD = 1.57), third-year cadets (N = 340) aged from 20 to 24 (M = 22; SD =1.02) of Novosibirsk Military Institute of the National Guard Troops of the Russian Federation (Novosibirsk) (n =188), of Saint Petersburg Military Institute of the National Guard troops of the Russian Federation (St. Petersburg) (n = 152). Methods (tools): the Level of Refl exivity Questionnaire (A. V. Karpov, V. V. Ponomareva) was used to record the level of personal refl ection; the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (G. Schraw, R. Dennison adapted by A. V. Karpov, I. M. Skityaeva) was used to study the control of self–knowledge – metacognitive involvement in activity; the Self-assessment of Metacognitive Knowledge and Metacognitive Activity Questionnaire (M. M. Kashapov, Yu. V. Skvortsova) was used to analyze an individual’s metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive activity. Results: the comparative analysis of intercorrelation matrices of metacognitive parameters in the samples of the servicemen with combat experience gained during SMO and of the cadets (servicemen without combat experience) indicates their heterogeneity (the express χ2-Karpov method). The main conclus ions: the organizational structure of the metacognitive subsystem of the cadets is less coherent than that of the SMO participants, which demonstrates qualitative diff erences in the intercorrelation matrices between the metacognitive parameters. This refl ects the assimilation of professional experience among servicemen as the formation of a semblance of a mental model of interaction while performing military tasks in the context of modern combating. Practical Significance: the results obtained reveal the necessity to include in the professional training of cadets the study of cases aimed at solving simulated military and combat situations in order to activate and enhance the integration of structural components of the metacognitive subsystem of mental models.
- Alexander P. A., Schallert D. L., Hare V. C. Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge // Rev. Educ. 1991. Vol. 61. P. 315–343. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170635
- Ball L. J., Threadgold E., Solowiej A., Marsh J. E. Can intrinsic and extrinsic metacognitive cues shield against distraction in problem solving? // Journal of Cognition. 2018. Vol. 1, iss. 1. P. 15–24. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.9
- Bell R., Mieth L., Röer J. P., Buchner A. The metacognition of auditory distraction: Judgments about the effects of deviating and changing auditory distractors on cognitive performance // Memory and Cognition. 2021. Vol. 50, iss. 1. P. 160–173. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01200-2
- Bell R., Komar G. F., Mieth L., Buchner A. Evidence of a metacognitive illusion in judgments about the effects of music on cognitive performance // Scientific Reports. 2018. Vol. 13, iss. 1. P. 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46169-x
- Kattner F., Bryce D. Attentional control and metacognitive monitoring of the effects of different types of task-irrelevant sound on serial recall // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2022. Vol. 48, iss. 2. P. 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000982
- Greely N. Reality testing and metacognition // Philosophical Psychology. 2024. P. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2024.2336588
- Dessie E., Gebeyehu D., Eshetu F. Motivation, conceptual understanding, and critical thinking as correlates and predictors of metacognition in introductory physics // Cogent Education. 2024. Vol. 11, iss. 1. P. 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290114
- Fleur D. S., Bredeweg B., van den Bos W. Metacognition: Ideas and insights from neuro-and educational sciences // Science of Learning. 2021. Vol. 13, iss. 6. P. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00089-5
- Agadzhanyan K., Castel A. D. The effect of emotional valence and font size on metacognition and memory // Memory. 2024. Vol. 32, iss. 2. P. 252–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2024.2307919
- Rummel J., Steindorf L., Wöstenfeld F. O., Steindorf L., Röer J. P. Effect of cognitive load on the perception of external and internal distractions and their relationship to attentional control // Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2024. Vol. 36, iss. 1. P. 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2023.2273576
- Carpendale J., Cooper R. Conceptual understanding procedure to elicit metacognition with pre-service physics teachers // Physics Education. 2021. Vol. 56, iss. 2. Article 025008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/abc8fd
- Tang Y., Wang X., Fang Y., Li J. The Antecedents and Consequences of Metacognitive Knowledge in Mathematics Learning: A Self-Determination Perspective // Frontiers in Psychology. 2021. Vol. 12. Article 754370. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754370
- Перевозкина Ю. М., Федоришин М. И. Структурные компоненты коллективных ментальных моделей и методы их исследования // Направления и перспективы развития образования в военных институтах войск национальной гвардии Российской Федерации : сб. науч. ст. XIV Междунар. науч.-практ. конф. / под общ. ред. В. В. Косухина. Новосибирск : Новосибирский военный институт, 2022. С. 266–274.
- Мекебаев Н. С., Перевозкина Ю. М., Федоришин М. И. Конфигурации коллективных ментальных моделей при решении служебно-боевых задач курсантами Росгвардии // Российский психологический журнал. 2022. Т. 19, № 2. С. 50–59. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2022.2.4, EDN: AVUPDY
- Klimoski R., Mohammed S. Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? // Journal of Management. 1994. Vol. 50. P. 403–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639402000206
- Mathieu J. E., Heffner T. S., Goodwin G. F., Salas E., Cannon-Bowers J. A. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance // Journal of Applied Psychology. 2000. Vol. 85, iss. 2. P. 273–283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273
- Перевозкина Ю. М., Перевозкин С. Б., Федоришин М. И. Ментальные модели социального взаимодействия в служебной деятельности. Новосибирск : Новосибирский государственный педагогический университет, 2023. 226 c. EDN: ZIDFWF
- Спирин А. В., Перевозкина Ю. М., Федоришин М. И. Критерии эффективности коллективных ментальных моделей // Методология современной психологии. 2023. № 17. С. 290–294. EDN: FTITFF
- Орлова И. В. Тренинг профессионального самопознания: теория, диагностика и практика педагогической рефлексии. СПб. : Речь, 2006. 128 с. EDN: ASITNF
- Карпов А. В., Скитяева И. М. Психология рефлексии. М. : Издательство «Институт психологии РАН», 2002. 320 с. EDN: ZIFRWF
- Кашапов М. М., Скворцова Ю В. Самооценка метакогнитивной активности // Ярославский психологический вестник. 2005. № 14. С. 65–70.
- Карпов А. В., Карпов А. А., Маркова Е. В. Психология принятия решения в управленческой деятельности. Метасистемный подход. М. : Издательский дом «Российской академии образования», 2016. 644 с. EDN: AVUPDY
- Федоришин М. И., Спирин А. В., Чайковский П. В. Особенности индивидуальности личности курсантов с высоким уровнем саморегуляции человеческий фактор // Социальный психолог. 2019. № 1 (37). С. 423–435. EDN: SXWRYM
- Спирин А. В., Перевозкина Ю. М., Федоришин М. И. Специфика структуры личностных особенностей в зависимости от типа темперамента у курсантов НВИ ВНГ РФ // Социальный психолог. 2020. № 2 (40). С. 295–303. EDN: ZIAFTQ
- Федоришин М. И., Перевозкина Ю. М. Специфика выраженности способностей и когнитивных процессов в зависимости от доминирующей ролевой модели курсантов при решении служебно-боевых задач // Актуальные проблемы профессионально-практической психологии (Дьяченковские чтения – 2022) : сб. науч. тр. I Междунар. науч.-практ. конф. М. : Военный университет, 2022. С. 513–520. EDN: APARAG
- Карпов А. В. Психология сознания: Метасистемный подход. М. : Издательский дом «Российской академии образования», 2011. 1088 с. EDN: QYBUYT
- Azevedo R. Reflections on the field of metacognition: Issues, challenges, and opportunities // Metacognition and Learning. 2020. Vol. 15, iss. 2. P. 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09231-x
- Zohar A., Ben-Ari G. Teachers’ knowledge and professional development for metacognitive instruction in the context of higher order thinking // Metacognition and Learning. 2022. Vol. 17, iss. 3. P. 855–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09310-1