Cite this article as:

Klenova M. A. Motivation of protest and socio-political activity of an individual and its potential in the system of life-purpose orientations. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2021, vol. 10, iss. 1, pp. 53-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2021-10-1-53-61


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
UDC: 
316.62
Language: 
Russian

Motivation of protest and socio-political activity of an individual and its potential in the system of life-purpose orientations

Abstract: 

The relevance of the study is conditioned by the need for formation of theoretical and practical knowledge and technologies that allow to determine the structure of motivation of socio-political and protest activity. The purpose of the study is to investigate motivation of protest and socio-political activity of an individual and its potential within the system of life-purpose orientations. Presumably, the motivational structure of socio-political and protest activity reveals similarities in the manifestation of qualitative and quantitative characteristics. The study was carried out on a sample of university students (N = 153) from the city of Saratov aged from 18 to 24 years using the following psycho-diagnostic tools: a questionnaire aimed at registering various forms of social activity (R. M. Shamionov, I. V. Arendachuk, E. E. Bocharova, et.al.); the author’s questionnaire aimed at studying motivation of socio-po litical and protest activity (M. A. Klenova); Basic Beliefs Scale (developed by R. YanoffBulman and modified by M. A. Padun and A. V. Kotelnikova); Life-Purpose Orientations Test (D. A. Leontiev). We found out that socio-political and protest forms of activity are not preferable for young people. We also determined the main motives of socio-political and protest activity: interest, reputation, the need to change the world, active civic position and self-expression. We established the similarity of motives for actualization of socio-political and protest activity. The motives for socio-political activity are the interest in the benevolence of the world around and the desire for personal reputation, maintaining a positive image of the ego and controlling personal invulnerability. The motives for protest activity are the need to implement active civic position and change the world outside and the need to control life events. The obtained data can be implemented in the practice of organizing socially useful activities of young people, taking into account the motives of its actualization.

References
  1. Popova S. Yu., Selezneva A. V. Social activity of youth: status problems and for prospects development. Personality Formation, 2018, no. 2, pp. 96–103 (in Russian).
  2. Kas’yanov V. V., Dashkevich G. V., Samygin S. I. Models of political socialization and electoral youth activity. Humanities, Social-economic and Social Sciences, 2017, no. 3. pp. 65–68. Available at: https://online-science.ru/m/products/social_sciense/gid4034/pg0/ (accessed 21 September 2020) (in Russian).
  3. Kopaeva E. V., Kotova K. A., Lisova S. Yu. Political activity of student youth: problems and trends. Historical, Philosophical, Political and Low Sciences, Culturologi and Study of Art Issues of Theory and Practice, 2017, no. 6-1 (80), pp. 82–86 (in Russian).
  4. Klenova M. A. Protest Activity and Its Psychological Content in the Context of Young People’s Socio-Political Activity. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2019, vol. 8, iss. 4, pp. 362–367 (in English). https://doi.org/10.18500/2304- 9790-2019-8-4-362-367
  5. Rudenkin D. V. Polarities of Russian youth’s political activity: a comparison of activists of pro-government and opposition movements. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 2020, no. 55, pp. 203–215 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863KH/55/21
  6. Guseva N. V., Dokuchayeva S. V. Destructive forms of student’s political activity. Political vector ‒ L. Complex problems of a modern policy, 2016, no. 1-2, pp. 171–187 (in Russian).
  7. Kruzhkova O. V., Vorobyeva I. V., Krivoshchkova M. S. Political activity of modern Russian youth and marginal political practices. Pedagogical Education in Russia, 2019, no. 9, pp. 22–31 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26170/po19-09-03
  8. Alekseev S. A., Gayazova E. B., Ilyasova F. F. Political activity and political identity of youth in modern conditions. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 2017, no. 5 (124), pp. 181–185 (in Russian).
  9. Vlasenko L. V. Self-realization of youth in the space of public polic. Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship, 2019, no. 4 (105), pp. 821–824 (in Russian).
  10. Manova M. V. The attitude of young people to political culture in modern society. Karelian Scientifi c Journal, 2020, vol. 9, no. 3 (32), pp. 93–96 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.26140/knz4-2020-0903-0022
  11. Sterlyadeva N. A. Some aspects of socio-political activity of modern youth. Sotsiologiya v sovremennom mire: nauka, obrazovaniye, tvorchestvo: sb. st. Eds. O. A. Kolesnikova, E. A. Popova [O. A. Kolesnikova, E. A. Popova, eds. Sociology in the Modern World: Science, Education, Creativity: Collection of Scientifi c Articles]. Barnaul, Izdatel’stvo Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2020, iss. 12, pp. 66–69 (in Russian).
  12. Selezneva A. V. Value orientations and civil-political activity of young Russian patriots. History and Modern Perspectives, 2020, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 62–70 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33693/2658-4654/-2020-2-3-62-70
  13. Loginova L. V., Shcheblanova V. V., Surkova I. Yu. Conceptual model of students’ destructive civic activity (based on the research materials in the Saratov region). Saratov State Law Academy Bulletin, 2019, no. 6 (131), pp. 246–255 (in Russian).
  14. Ponomarev A. A. Youth social activity realization in a Russian region (by the example of the Saratov region). Bulletin of the Volga Region Institute of Administration, 2018, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 138–144 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/1682-2358-2018-3-138-144
  15. Bocharova E. E. Representations of personality about cultural and historical facts and their role in social activity determination. Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series: Psychology, 2020, no. 1, pp. 22–35 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7235-2020-1-22-35
  16. Shamionov R. M. The role of civic identity in the preferences of civil and political forms of social activity in Russian youth. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 2020, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 459–472 (in English). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2020-17-3-459-472
  17. Shamionov R. M. The ratio of social activity and satisfaction of basic psychological needs, subjective well-being and social frustration of young people. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 2020, no. 77, pp. 176–195 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/77/9
  18. Zagranichny A. I. The situational and worldview factors in the social and political involvement of the youth. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics, 2018, iss. 9 (53), pp. 67–71 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.24158/spp.2018.9.13
  19. Bocharova E. E. Structural organization of regulatory factors of various forms of social activity of young people. Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 2018, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 383–389 (in Russian).
  20. Padun M. A., Kotel’nikova A. V. Modifi cation of the research methodology for basic immunities by R. YanoffBulman. Psychological Journal, 2008, no. 4, pp. 98–106 (in Russian).
  21. Leont’yev D. A. Test smyslozhiznennykh oriyentatsiy (SZhO) [Life Meaningful Orientation Test (LSS)]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2000. 18 p. (in Russian).
Full text (in Russian):
(downloads: 36)
Short text (in English):
(downloads: 9)