Cite this article as:

Sharov A. A. Measuring Cyber Aggression: Development of Russian Version of CYBA Questionnaire. Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2020, vol. 9, iss. 2, pp. 118-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2020-9-2-118-125


UDC: 
159.9.072
Language: 
Russian

Measuring Cyber Aggression: Development of Russian Version of CYBA Questionnaire

Abstract: 

The purpose of the study presented in the article is to adapt and validate the CYBA questionnaire (Cyber-aggression Questionnaire for Adolescents, D. Álvarez-García et al.) on a Russian sample. Validation of the Russian version of the questionnaire included the following psychometric procedures: assessment of obvious and substantive validity (method of expert estimates with calculation of Kendall concordance coefficient), refinement of the structure (exploratory factor analysis with equimax rotation), verification of internal consistency (calculation of α Cronbach coefficients), split reliability (assessment of the relationship between odd and even points), convergent validity (analysis of correlation value with two other methods), diachronic reliability (test-retest). The sample consisted of 250 respondents. Factor analysis data confirmed the three-factor model of the questionnaire. However, the Russian version items were distributed in a slightly different context, when compared to the original version. The final structure of the questionnaire is presented by the following scales: “Impersonation” (points 1,12,18), “Sexting” (points 2,3,6,9,14), “Verbal-visual cyber-regression” (points 4,5,7,8 10,11,13,15,16,17,19), Integrative Cyber Aggression Scale (points 1-19). The level of internal consistency in the range of values is: α 0.691–0.732, the relationship of the scales is 0.242–1. The range of retest indicators is 0.914–0.934. The reliability of parts is 0.616. Converged validity indicators (with scales of methods used in the context under consideration) vary within the range of 0.118–0.444. The obtained results allow us to state that modifiable psychometric tools can be used for research purposes in the aspect of studying the phenomenon of cyber aggression. The prospect of the study is conditioned by standardization procedures on the samples of respondents belonging to different age groups.

References

1. Rossiya v tsifrakh 2018: kratkiy statisticheskiy sbornik [Russia in Numbers: Short Statistical Collection]. Moscow, Rosstat Publ., 2018. 522 p. (in Russian).
2. Bocharova E. E. Typical Spheres of Social Activity Manifestation in Modern Youth. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 2019, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 359–376 (in Russian). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-1683-2019-16-3-359-376
3. Mishna F., Regehr C., Lacombe-Duncan A., Daciuk J., Fearing G., Van Wert M. Social Media, Cyber-Aggression and Student Mental Health on a University Campus. Journal of Mental Health, 2018, vol. 27, iss. 3, pp. 222–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2018.1437607
4. Vandenbos G. R., ed. APA Dictionary of Psychology. 2nd ed. Washington, American Psychological Association, 2015. 1204 p.
5. Chibbaro J. School Counselors and the Cyberbully: Interventions and Implications. Professional School Counseling, 2007, vol. 11, no 1, pp. 65–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5330/PSC.n.2010-11.65
6. Schoffstall C., Cohen R. Cyber Aggression: The Relation between Online Offenders and Offl ine. Social Competence. Social Development, 2011, vol. 20, iss. 3, pp. 586–604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00609
7. Willard N. E. Cyberbullying and Cyberthreats: Responding to the Challenge of Online Social Aggression, Threats, and Distress. Champaign, Illinois, Research Press, 2007. 320 р.
8. Soldatova G. U., Yarmina A. N. Cyberbullying: Features, Role Structure, Parent-Child Relationships and Coping Strategies. National Psychological Journal, 2019, vol. 3, no. 3 (35), pp. 17–31(in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2019.0303
9. Cherenkov D. A. Deviant behavior in social networks: causes, forms, consequences. Nauka-rastudent.ru, 2015, no. 07 (19). Available at: http://nauka-rastudent.ru/19/2843/ (accessed 02 August 2019) (in Russian).
10. Sharov A. A. Specifi cs of Young People’s Deviant Activity in Internet Environment. Scientifi c Notes: The Online Academic Journal of Kursk State University, 2019, no. 3 (51), pp. 255–261. Available at: http://scientifi c-notes.ru/#new-number (accessed 25 January 2020) (in Russian).
11. Soldatova G. U., Shlyapnikov V. N., Zhurina M. A. The evolution of online-risks: the results of helpline “KIDS ONLINE” fi ve years work. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 2015, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 50–66 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2015230304
12. Ruzhenkov V. A., Luk’yantseva I. S. New Features of Clinical Diagnostic Screening of Risk Addictive Behavior and Dependence. Belgorod State University Scientifi c bulletin. Series Medicine. Pharmacy, 2016, vol. 35, no. 19 (240), pp. 36–47 (in Russian).
13. Toncheva A. V. Diagnostics of cyber communication addiction. Internet-zhurnal «Naukovedeniye» [Online Journal Science of Science], 2012, no. 4 (13), pp. 138–143 (in Russian).
14. Musalimova R. S., Akhmadeev R. R. Brief Description of Methods for Assessment of Internet-Dependent Behavior. The Bryansk State University Herald, 2015, no. 3, pp. 32–35 (in Russian).
15. Lazhintseva E. M., Bochaver A. A. Internet as New Environment for Teenager’s Deviant Behavior]. Voprosy psikhologii [Voprosy Psychologii], 2015, no. 4, pp. 49–58 (in Russian).
16. Gorbacheva A. G. Konstruktivnyye i destruktivnyye kommunikativnyye praktiki lyudey v seti internet [People’s Constructive and Destructive Communicative Practices on Internet]. Idei i idealy [Ideas & Ideals], 2013, vol. 2, no. 3 (17), pp. 17–25 (in Russian).
17. Álvarez-García D., Barreiro-Collazo A., Núñez J. С., Dobarro A. Validity and reliability of the Cyber-aggression Questionnaire for Adolescents (CYBA). The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 2016, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 69–77. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2016.02.003
18. Baturin N. A., Mel’nikova N. N. Technology of test development: part III. Bulletin of South Ural State University. Series Psychology, 2010, iss. 8, no. 4 (180), pp. 4–18 (in Russian).
19. Barkanova O. V. Metodiki diagnostiki emotsional’noy sfery: psikhologicheskiy praktikum [Methods of Diagnostics of Emotional Sphere: Psychological Workshop]. Krasnoyarsk, Litera-Print Publ., 2009. 237 р. (in Russian).
20. Sharov A. A. Method of Studying Deviant Activity in the Real and Virtual Environment. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2019, vol. 8, iss. 1 (29), pр. 30–37 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2019-8-1-30-37

Full text (in Russian):
(downloads: 29)
Short text (in English):
(downloads: 7)