Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology

Izvestiya of Saratov University.

ISSN 2304-9790 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9013 (Online)


For citation:

Matyushkina A. А., Kunashenko M. I. Conditions for effectiveness of prompts in solving challenging problems of artistic and scientific content. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2021, vol. 10, iss. 1, pp. 62-72. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2021-10-1-62-72

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 123)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
159.955

Conditions for effectiveness of prompts in solving challenging problems of artistic and scientific content

Autors: 
Matyushkina Anna А., Lomonosov Moscow State University
Kunashenko Marina I., Lomonosov Moscow State University
Abstract: 

The study analyzes the problem of the influence of prompts on the achievement of creative problem solution and conditions under which it is effective. The relevance of the topic is determined by the context of the determinants and factors that define success of solving creative problems. From the standpoint of the problem situations theory, we revealed conditions for positive influence of direct and indirect prompts in solving problems of different content. Various characteristics of the subject of thinking are considered as conditions: from the perspective of the intellectual sphere, it is general intelligence and depth of analysis, while from the perspective of motivational sphere, it is manifestation of situational cognitive need, from the perspective of personality sphere, these are characteristics associated with the task content. The purpose is to study conditions for effectiveness of prompts in solving problem situations of different content. We propose the hypotheses stating that conditions for effectiveness of prompts are: manifestation of interest in solving challenging problems of any content; intellectual characteristics when solving scientific problems; personal characteristics when solving artistic problems. The sample consisted of 39 people: 27 students of the 1st and 2nd year of the Faculty of Psychology from Moscow State University and 12 specialists in the problem field. It also involved representatives of other professional fields, who carried out expert assessment of the effectiveness of prompts. The participants of the study solved 8 challenging problems of scientific and artistic content with prompts, 216 solution protocols were analysed. We used the following techniques: “Progressive matrices of Raven” and “Complex analogies” for diagnostics of intellectual features; the technique of self-actualization of personality for personality sphere diagnostics; subjective scaling for diagnostics of the assessment of interest manifestation. It is shown that subjective conditions for the effectiveness of the prompt are different depending on the content of the problem and on its difficulty for the subject. For most problematic situations of scientific content, a direct prompt turns out to be significant, and the condition for its effectiveness is the manifestation of the subject’s interest in the solution. For difficult problematic situations of artistic content, the depth of analysis, general intelligence and personal characteristics of the subject, which are associated with understanding the content of the problem, are the conditions for the effectiveness of indirect prompts.

Reference: 
  1. Vertgeymer M. Produktivnoye myshleniye. Obssh. red. S. F. Gorbova, V. P. Zinchenko [Productive Thinking. S. F. Gorbova, V. P. Zinchenko, total ed.]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1987. 336 p. (in Russian).
  2. Dunker K. Psychology of Productive Thinking. In: Psikhologiya myshleniya [A. M. Matyushkin, ed. Psychology of Thinking]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1965, pp. 86–234 (in Russian).
  3. Valuyeva E. A., Mosinyan A. E., Lapteva E. M. Emotional hint and effective problem solving. Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2013, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 5–15 (in Russian).
  4. Valuyeva E. A., Lapteva E. M. The Phenomenon of Hints in Problem Solving: Creativity Psychology Point of View. Part 2. Hint Effects in Complex Cognitive Tasks. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2012, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 140–162 (in Russian).
  5. Medyntsev A. A., Kolbeneva M. G., Pitt S. A. The infl uence of an implicit hints to insight solution in anagrams decition task. Vestnik nauki i obrazovaniya, 2017, no. 2 (26), pp. 109–116 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20861/2312-8089-2017-26-002
  6. Medyntsev A. A. The infl uence of implicit cue on information processing in anagram solving task. Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2017, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 23–37 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2017100103
  7. Vasil'yev I. A., Popluzhnyy V. L., Tikhomirov O. K. Emotsii i myshleniye [Emotions and thinking]. Moscow, MSU Press, 1980. 192 p. (in Russian).
  8. Medyntsev A. A., Sabadosh P. A., Kogan A. A., Moskvina V. D., Nemirova S. A., Kayutina D. V. The role of anticipatory attention in insight and non-insight solutions in the anagram solution task. National Psychological Journal, 2020, no. 1 (37), pp. 66–77 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2020.0107
  9. Rubinshteyn S. L. Osnovy obshchey psikhologii [Fundamentals of General Psychology]. St. Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2000. 712 p. (in Russian).
  10. Leont'yev A. N. Lektsii po obshchey psikhologii [Lectures on General Psychology]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2000. 511 p. (in Russian).
  11. Kornilova T.V. Tolerance for Uncertainty and Emotional Intelligence and the Use of Hints in Decition-Making. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2014, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 19–36 (in Russian).
  12. Ponomarev Ya. A. Psikhologiya tvorcheskogo myshleniya [Psychology of creative thinking]. Moscow, APN RSFSR Publ., 1960. 345 p. (in Russian).
  13. Brushlinskiy A. V. Myshlenie i prognozirovanie [Thinking and prognosis]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1979. 230 p. (in Russian).
  14. Valuyeva E. A., Ushakov D. V. Signal model of insight. In: A. L. Zhuravlev, D. V. Ushakov, M. A. Kholodnaya, eds. Sovremennyye issledovaniya intellekta i tvorchestva [Modern Studies of Intelligence and Creativity]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Publishing House, 2015, pp. 15–48 (in Russian).
  15. Naumenko O. V., Allakhverdov V. M., Gershkovich V. A., Filippova M. G., Kostina D. I. Creating a new context as a way to solve a creative problem. In: A. L. Zhuravlev, D. V. Ushakov, M. A. Kholodnaya, eds. Sovremennyye issledovaniya intellekta i tvorchestva [Modern Studies of Intelligence and Creativity]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Publishing House, 2015, pp. 65–78 (in Russian).
  16. Vladimirov I. Yu., Pavlishchak O. V. Overcoming fi xedness as a possible mechanism for insightful solution. In: A. L. Zhuravlev, D. V. Ushakov, M. A. Kholodnaya, eds. Sovremennyye issledovaniya intellekta i tvorchestva [Modern studies of intelligence and creativity]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Publishing House, 2015, pp. 48–65 (in Russian).
  17. Matyushkin A. M. Psikhologiya myshleniya. Myshlenie kak razreshenie problemnykh situatsiy [Pshychology of Thinking. Thinking as Problem Solving]. Moscow, ID Mezhdunarodnyi otnosheniya Publ., 2017. 226 p. (in Russian).
  18. Znakov V. V. Psikhologiya ponimaniya mira cheloveka [Psychology of Understanding the Human World]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Publishing House, 2016. 488 p. (in Russian).
  19. Raven J. K. Standartnyye progressivnyye matritsy serii A, V, S, D, E [Standard Progressive Matrix Series A, B, C, D, E]. Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr Publ., 2006. 60 p. (in Russian).
  20. Al’manakh psikhologicheskikh testov [Almanac of Psychological Tests]. Moscow, KSP Publ., 1995. 397 p. (in Russian).
  21. Fetiskin N. P., Kozlov V. V., Manuylov G. M. Sotsial’nopsikhologicheskaya diagnostika lichnosti i malykh grupp [Socio-psychological Diagnostics of Personality and Small Groups]. Moscow, Izd-vo Instituta Psikhterapii, 2002. 488 p. (in Russian).
  22. Matyushkina A. A. Levels of problem solving as a refl ection of the depth of thinking. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 2015, no. 3, pp. 93–107 (in Russian).
  23. Matyushkina A. A., Kunashenko M. I. Creativity’ as a prerequisite for solving problem situations. Actual problems of psychological knowledge, 2019, no. 1 (50), pp. 61–72 (in Russian).
  24. Matyushkina A. A., Kameneva A. G. The role of emotional intelligence in solving problems of artistic content (on literary and musical material). In: V. V. Znakov, A. L. Zhuravlev, executive eds. Psikhologiya cheloveka kak subekta poznaniya, obshcheniya i deyatel’nosti [Psychology of a person as a subject of knowledge, communication and activity]. Moscow, Institute of Psychology RAS Publishing House, 2018, pp. 1056–1066 (in Russian).
Received: 
07.11.2020
Accepted: 
13.12.2020
Published: 
31.03.2021