Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology

Izvestiya of Saratov University.

ISSN 2304-9790 (Print)
ISSN 2541-9013 (Online)

For citation:

Djidaryan I. A., Maslova O. V. Classical Writers on Love: the Contemporary Look. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2018, vol. 7, iss. 2, pp. 143-148. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2018-7-2-143-148

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 137)
Article type: 

Classical Writers on Love: the Contemporary Look

Djidaryan Inna A., Institute of Psychology RAS
Maslova Olga V., Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

The purpose of the research presented in the article was to determine how close the statements about love made by the classics to the views of our contemporaries. The study involved 230 people aged 19 to 61 years old, the mean age is 29 years, the sample consisted of 52% of women and 48% of men. We used the questionnaire “Concepts of love», especially designed for the purposes of the research, which includes 26 statements about love made by famous cultural figures of different times and nations. Three groups of statements according to the degree of their acceptance by respondents were singled out. Most of our contemporaries agree with the fact that love is the desire for happiness to another person, and also that love is the creator of everything good, sublime, strong, warm and bright. The least they agree to perceive love as a hindrance and an obstacle in life. In general, the views of our contemporaries about love are in accordance with the ideas of the classical literature about it; they are also inclined to associate it with dedication, the ability to bring gifts, and also with the meaning of life. Gender differences are revealed: the ideas of women’s love are more romantic and idealistic than those of men.


​1. Allport G. Stanovlenie lichnosti [Formation of Personality]. Moscow, 2002. 462 p. (in Russian, trans. from English).

2. Berscheid E., Walster (Hatfi eld) E. H. Interpersonal Attraction. Reading, 1969. 246 p.

3. Rubin Z. Measurement of romantic love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 265–273.

4. Hendrick С., Hendrick S. A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, vol. 50, pp. 392–402.

5. Sternberg R. J. A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 1986, vol. 93, pp. 119–135.

6. Hatfi eld E. Passionate and Companionate Love. In: The Psychology of Love. Eds. R. J. Sternberg, M. L. Barnes. New Haven, CT, 1988, pp. 191–217.

7. Lee J. A. Love-styles. In: The Psychology of Love. Eds. R. J. Sternberg, M. L. Barnes. New Haven, CT, 1988, pp. 38–67.

8. Tzeng О. C. S. Measurement of Love and Intimate Relations: Theories, Scales, and Applications for Love Development, Maintenance, and Dissolution. Westport, CT, 1993. 328 p.

9. Hatfi eld E., Bensman L., Rapson R. A brief history of social scientists’ attempts to measure passionate love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2012, Vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 143–164.

10. Leont’ev D. A. Ontologiya lyubvi: za predelami slova i chuvstva [Ontology of Love: Beyond Words and Feeling]. In: Ot sobytiia k bytiiu: grani tvorchestva Galiny Ivanchenko [From Event toward Being: Facets of Galina Ivanchenko’s Creativity]. Ed. by M. A. Kozlova. Moscow, 2010, pp. 71–102 (in Russian).

11. Dzhidar’yan I. A., Belovol E. V., Maslova O. V. Razrabotka oprosnika dlya izucheniya predstavleniy o lyubvi [Elaboration of Questionnaire for Study of Notions about Love]. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 2014, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 111–119 (in Russian).

12. Dzhidar’yan I. A., Maslova O. V. Predstavleniya o lyubvi v yunosheskom vozraste: gendernyy aspekt [Adolescents’ Notions about Love: Gender Aspect]. In: Differentsial’naya psikhologiya i differentsial’naya psikhofiziologiya segodnya: materialy konf., posvyashch. 115-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya B. M. Teplova (Moskva, 10–11 noyabrya 2011 g. [Differential Psychology and Differential PsychoPhysiology Today: Proceeding of Conference Dedicated to 115-years from V. M. Teplov’s Birthday {Moscow, November 10–11 2011}]. Moscow, 2011, pp. 129–130 (in Russian).