Cite this article as:

Kaptsov A. V., Nekrasova E. V. Attractors of university students’ agency development stages. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2021, vol. 10, iss. 2, pp. 98-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2021-10-2-98-107


This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
UDC: 
159.922
Language: 
Russian

Attractors of university students’ agency development stages

Abstract: 

The relevant problem of social educational psychology is to identify states of self-organization and self-development of students’ psychological traits in the academic group. One of the possible ways to solve the problem is to use the mathematical theory of dynamic systems to determine the attractors of the development stages of university students’ agency. The purpose of the study presented in the article is to substantiate application of the theory of complex dynamic systems in modeling development stages of university students’ agency. Hypothesis of the study: the theory of complex dynamic systems is applicable to modeling the development stages of university students’ agency. Approbation of the theory of dynamical systems was carried out in the course of a longitudinal study in four groups of 1st to 4th year full-time students (N = 79; M = 19.6; SD = 2.4 years; 100% women). The study revealed that the development stages of university students’ agency have one stable stationary state. The interval between two measurements was 28 weeks. The most common attractors are found in the “learner” and “master” stages. We revealed two stable states in the stages in the second-year students’ group. The stages indicate presence of micro groups with different levels of manifestation of development stages of agency, which are characterized by the phenomenon of self-organization in the academic group. The applied aspect of the study is to create a dynamic model of the stages of university students’ agency development in a separate academic group. The research showed prospects of applying the dynamic systems theory combined with the ecopsychological approach.

References
  1. Kaptsov A. V., Kolesnikova E. I. The relationship of external and internal factors with the stages of formation of subjectivity of students. The Bulletin of the Samara Humanitarian Academy. A series Psychology, 2019, no. 1 (25), pp. 63–73 (in Russian).
  2. Panov V. I. Ekopsikhologiya: paradigmal’niy poisk [Ecopsychology: Paradigmatic Search]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya Publ., 2014. 304 p. (in Russian).
  3. Kaptsov A. V., Kolesnikova E. I. Development of subject competences of students with different severity stages of the formation of subjectness. The Bulletin of the Samara Humanitarian Academy. A series Psychology, 2017, no. 2 (22), p. 109–117 (in Russian).
  4. Kaptsov A. V., Kolesnikova E. I., Selezneva M. V., Plaksina I. V. Diagnosis stages of development of subjectivity of students. Psychology. Historical-critical Reviews and Current Researches, 2018, vol. 7, iss. 5A, pp. 158–169 (in Russian).
  5. Panov V. I., Kaptsov A. V., Kolesnikova E. I. Didactic and psychodidactic aspects of modeling of formation of agency of a university student. Pedagogy and Education, 2019, no. 4, pp. 125–135 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0676.2019.4.31093
  6. Panov V. I., ed. Stanovlenie sub»ektnosti uchashchegosya i pedagoga: ekopsikhologicheskaya model’ [Formation of Agency of the Student and Teacher: Ecopsychological Model]. Moscow, St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya Publ., 2018. 304 p. (in Russian).
  7. Mdivani M. O., ed. Sub’ekt-sredovye vzaimodeystviya: ekopsikhologicheskiy podkhod k razvitiyu psikhiki [Subjectenvironment Interactions: Ecopsychological Approach to the Development of the Psyche]. Moscow, Pero Publ., 2017. 160 p. (in Russian).
  8. Kaptsov A. V., Panov V. I. Interconnection of personal qualities of a subject with ecopsychological types of interaction in activities and communication. Experimental Psychology (Russia), 2019, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 72–80 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2019120406
  9. Kaptsov A. V. Lichnostnoe i intellektual’noe razvitie studentov v usloviyakh uchebnoy gruppy sovremennogo vuza [Personal and Intellectual Development of Students in the Conditions of the Study Group of a Modern University]. Samara, Samarskiy nauchniy tsentr RAN Publ., 2011. 214 p. (in Russian).
  10. Mitina O. V., Petrenko V. F. Dynamics of political consciousness as a process of self-organization. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ [Social Sciences and Contemporary World], 1995, no. 5, pp. 103–115 (in Russian).
  11. Petrenko V. F., Mitina O. V. Psikhosemanticheskiy analiz dinamiki obshchestvennogo soznaniya: Na materiale politicheskogo mentaliteta. [Psychosemantic analysis of the dynamics of public consciousness: Based on the material of political mentality. 2nded.]. Moscow : Moscow University Press, 1997. 214 p. (in Russian).
  12. Vallacher R. R., Lewenstein M. Dynamical systems: A tool for social psychology? In: R. R. Vallacher, A. Nowak, eds. Dynamical Systems in Social Psychology. San Diego (ets.), Academic Press, 1994, pp. 17–53. Available at: https:// psycnet.apa.org/record/1994–97115-002 (accessed 5 January 2021).
  13. Watters P. A., Ball P. J. Carr S. C. Social processes as dynamical processes: qualitative dynamical systems theory in social psychology. Сurrent Research in Social Psychology, 1996, vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 60–68. Available at: http://www. uidaho.edu/~grpproc (accessed 5 January 2021).
  14. Steenbeek H., Van Geert P. An empirical validation of a dynamic systems model of interaction: do children of different sociometric statuses differ in their dyadic play? Developmental Science, 2008, vol. 11, iss. 2, pp. 253–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–7687.2007.00655.x
  15. Richardson M. J., Dale R., Marsh K. L. Complex dynamical systems in social and personality psychology: Theory, modeling, and analysis. In: H. T. Reis, C. M. Judd, eds. Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. Cambridge, UK, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 253–282. Available at: https:// psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-12227-011 (accessed 5 January 2021).
  16. Abraham J. L. Dynamical systems theory: Application to pedagogy. Studies of Nonlinear Phenomena in Life Science. The Dynamical Systems Approach to Cognition, 2003, vol. 11, pp. 295–307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812564399_0015
  17. Renshaw I., Davids K. W., Shuttleworth R., Chow J. Y. Insights from ecological psychology and dynamical systems: Theory can underpin a philosophy of coaching. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 2009, no. 40 (4), pp. 580–602.
  18. Araújo D., Davids K. Embodied Cognition and Emergent Decision-Making in Dynamical Movement Systems. Junctures, 2004, no. 2, pp. 45–57. Available at: https://www. academia.edu/1424208 (accessed 5 January 2021).
  19. Van Geert P. Nonlinear complex dynamical systems in developmental psychology. In: S. J. Guastello, M. Koopmans, D. Pincus, eds. Chaos and Complexity in Psychology: the Theory of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 242–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139058544.009
  20. Izhikevich E. M. Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience. The Geometry of Excitability and Bursting. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England, The MIT Press, 2007. 497 p. Available at: https://www.izhikevich.org/publications/dsn.pdf (accessed: 05.01.2021).
  21. Metzger M. A. Applications of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems Theory in Developmental Psychology: Motor and Cognitive Development. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 2001, no. 1, pp. 55–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022323926870
  22. Kaptsov A. V., Kichigin V. N., eds. Psihologo-pedagogicheskoe obespechenie mnogourovnevogo vysshego obrazovaniya [Psychological and Pedagogical Support of Multilevel Higher Education]. Samara, SamGASA Publ., 2003. 316 p. (in Russian).
  23. Kaptsov A. V., Kolesnikova E. I. Formation of subjectivity of students in higher education institution in aspect of competence-based approach. The Bulletin of the Samara Humanitarian Academy. A series Psychology, 2018, no. 1 (23), pp. 16–33 (in Russian).
  24. Kaptsov A. V., Kolesnikova E. I. Development of subjectivity of a technical university student in the formation of competencies. L. A. Tsvetkova, E. N. Volkova, A. V. Miklyaeva, eds. Gertsenovskie chteniya: psikhologicheskie issledovaniya v obrazovanii: materialy I Mezhdunar. nauch. prakt. konf.: v 2 ch. Ch. 1. [The Herzen Readings: Psychological Studies in Education: Proceedings of the I International Scientifi c and Practical Conference. In 2 parts. Part 1]. St. Petersburg, Izd-vo RGPU im. A. I. Hertzena, 2018, pp. 186–191 (in Russian).
  25. Kornilova T. V. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya [Experimental Psychology]. Moscow, Yurait Publ., 2012. 640 p. (in Russian).
  26. Moon F. Khaoticheskie kolebaniya: Vvodniy kurs dlya nauchnykh rabotnikov i inzhenerov [Chaotic Oscillations: An Introductory Course for Scientists and Engineers]. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1990. 312 p. (in Russian, trans. from English).
  27. Kaptsov A. V., Kolesnikova E. I. Modifi ed method of diagnostics of stages of formation of students’ subjectivity. The Bulletin of the Samara Humanitarian Academy. A series Psychology, 2018, no. 2 (24), pp. 107–117 (in Russian).
  28. Gordeeva T. O., Sychev O. A., Osin E. N. “Academic motivation scales” questionnaire. Psychological Journal, 2014, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 98–109 (in Russian).
  29. Kenrick D. T. Evolutionary Psychology, Cognitive Science, and Dynamical Systems: Building an Integrative Paradigm. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2001, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 13–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467–8721.00104
Full text (in Russian):
(downloads: 45)
Short text (in English):
(downloads: 12)