For citation:
Tolochek V. A. The Phenomenon of “Resources”: Topos and Chronos in the Actualization of Environmental Conditions as Resources. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2018, vol. 7, iss. 3, pp. 250-260. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2018-7-3-250-260
The Phenomenon of “Resources”: Topos and Chronos in the Actualization of Environmental Conditions as Resources
The aim of the research is to study the relationship between the measure of social success of middle-aged people and the conditions of the social environment (spatial characteristics) and the temporal characteristics of their actualization (usage, creation, acquisition) as resources. Hypothesis: the conditions of the social environment, actualized as resources at different time stages of the social formation of the subject, have different significance for representatives of different social groups. Methods and approaches: a research method (“Lifestyle” questionnaire); methods of parametric statistics (descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, factor analysis, discriminant analysis, multiple and regression analysis, t-comparison). The innovation of the research results: the total sample (representatives of three professions – accountants, private entrepreneurs, managers aged 30 to 55, N = 218) was repeatedly divided into two or three subgroups according to different criteria. The criteria of division were socio-demographic and work-related characteristics (gender, age, marital status, absence or presence of children, length of work and family life, job position, profession, place of residence etc.), and their derivatives (“Promptness of career”, “family”). The article demonstrated the differences between the allocated social groups (by gender, age, profession, position etc.) in the context of certain conditions of circumstances and the time of their actualization for the success of self-realization of people in the sphere of work (in a profession, in a career) and family. Conclusions: The conditions of the social environment, actualized as resources at different stages of time of the subject’s social formation, have different significance for representatives of different social groups. The variables, in which the differences between the allocated social groups reached a level of statistical significance, were: marital status, the presence and number of children, the place of birth, the education and job position of the father and mother, the recognition of the role of the father and mother in the development of their professionalism, acknowledgement of the role of women, men, leaders, work collectives, circumstances, science. The conditions of the social environment are unequal in relation to different manifestations of the social success of people. For most of the significant conditions of the social environment, there are no linear dependencies.
1. Vodop’yanova N. E., Starchenkova E. S. Sindrom vygoraniya: diagnostika i profi laktika [Burnout Syndrome: Diagnostic and Prophylaxis]. St. Petersburg, 2005. 194 p. (in Russian).
2. Zhuravleva N. I. Rol’ predstavleniy o vnesub”ektnykh i intrasub”ektnykh resursakh v stanovlenii professionala [Role of Presentations of Out-of-Subject and Intra-Subject Resources in Professional’s Establishment]. Thesis. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Psychol). Moscow, 2014. 24 p. (in Russian).
3. Leont’ev D. A. Lichnostnyy potentsial kak ob”ekt izucheniya [Personal Potential as Object of Study]. In: Lichnostnyy potentsial: struktura i diagnostika [Personal potential: Structure and Diagnostic]. Ed. by D. A. Leont’ev. Moscow, 2011, pp. 5–11 (in Russian).
4. Markov V. N. Lichnostno-professional’nyy potentsial upravlentsa i ego otsenka [Manager’s Personal and Professional Potential and Its Valuation]. Moscow, 2001. 278 p. (in Russian).
5. Tolochek V. A., Zhuravleva N. I. Dinamika aktualizatsii resursov sub”ekta na protyazhenii professional’noy kar’ery [Dynamics of Actualization of Subject’s Resources during Professional Career]. Psikhol. zhurn. [Psychological Journal], 2015, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 91–107 (in Russian).
6. Tolochek V. A. Stili deyatel’nosti: resursnyy podkhod [Activity Styles: Resource Approach]. Moscow, 2015. 366 p. (in Russian).
7. Tolochek V. A. Professional’naya kar’era kak sotsial’nopsikhologicheskiy fenomen [Professional Career as Social-Psychological Phenomenon]. Moscow, 2017. 262 p. (in Russian).
8. Khazova S. A., Dor’eva E. A. Resursy sub”ekta: teoriya i praktika issledovaniya [Subject’s Resources: Theory and Praxis of Research]. Kostroma, 2012. 230 p. (in Russian).
9. Diener E., Fujita F. Resources, personal strivings, and subjective well-being: a nomothetic and idiographic approach. Journal of Social Psychology, 1995, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 926–935.
10. Matheny K. B., Aycock D. W., Curlette W. L., Junker G. N. The coping resources inventory for stress: A measure of perceived resourcefulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1993, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 815–830.
11. Taylor Sh. E. Health Psychology. New York, 1995. 296 p.
12. Bocharova E. E. Samoopredelenie lichnosti kak sub”ekta professional’noy sotsializatsii [Personality’s Self-Determination as Subject of Professional Socialization]. Problemy sotsial’noy psikhologii lichnosti: mezhvuz. sb. nauch. tr. [Issues of Personality’s Social Psychology: the inter-universities collection of scientifi c papers], Saratov, 2012, iss. 10, pp. 121–128 (in Russian).
13. Shamionov R. M., Grigor’eva M. V. Psikhologiya sotsial’noy aktivnosti molodezhi: problemy i riski [Psychology of Youth’s Social Activity: Problems and Risks]. Saratov, 2012. 384 p. (in Russian).
14. Shamionov R. M., Grigor’eva M. V. Psikhologiya sub”ektivnogo blagopoluchiya i sotsial’noy aktivnosti lichnosti [Psychology of Personality’s Subjective Well-Being and Social ASctivity]. Saratov, 2014. 196 p. (in Russian).
15. Kaptsov A. V. Lichnostnoe i intellektual’noe razvitie studentov v usloviyakh uchebnoy gruppy sovremennogo vuza [Students’ Personal and Intellectual Development in Conditions of Academic Group of Modern University]. Samara, 2011. 214 p. (in Russian).
16. Kolesnikova E. I. Lichnostnye i tsennostnye aspekty samoregulyatsii sub”ektov obrazovatel’nogo protsessa v vuze [Personal and Axiological Aspects of Self-Regulation by Subjects of Educational Process at University]. Vestn. Samar. gumanit. akad. Ser. Psikhologiya [The Bulletin of Samara Humanitarian Academy. A series of “Psycho logy”], 2012, no. 1 (11), pp. 9–26 (in Russian).
17. Laktionova A. I. Zhiznesposobnost’ i sotsial’naya adaptatsiya podrostkov [Adolescents’ Har diness and Social Adaptation]. Moscow, 2017. 236 p. (in Russian).
18. Makhnach A. V. Zhiznesposobnost’ cheloveka i sem’i: sotsial’no-psikhologicheskaya paradigm [Person’s and Family’s Hardiness: Social-Psychological Paradigm]. Moscow, 2016. 459 p. (in Russian).
19. Postylyakova Yu. V. Semeynye resursy i individual’naya zhiznesposobnost’ kandidatov v zameshchayushchie roditeli [Family Resources: Individual Vitality of Candidates to Substitute Parents]. In: Zhiznesposobnost’ cheloveka: individual’nye, professional’nye i sotsial’nye aspekty [Person’s Vitality: Individual, Professional and Social Aspects]. Eds. A. V. Makhnach, L. G. Dikaya. Moscow, 2016, pp. 425–440 (in Russian).
20. Nartova-Bochaver S. K., Teryushkina Yu. Yu. Obraz budushchego u lyudey s raznym proshlym (longiyudnoe issledovanie prozhivaniya krizisa yunosti) [Image of Future in People with Different Past (Longitude Research of Living of Youth Crisis)]. In: Printsip razvitiya v sovremennoy psikhologii [Principle of Development in Modern Psychology]. Eds. A. L. Zhuravlev, E. A. Sergienko. Moscow, 2016, pp. 439–457 (in Russian).
21. Sergienko E. A. Sovremennye idei razvitiya v psikhologii [Modern Ideas of Development in Psychology]. In: Printsip razvitiya v sovremennoy psikhologii [Principle of Development in Modern Psychology]. Eds. A. L. Zhuravlev, E. A. Sergienko. Moscow, 2016, pp. 84–115 (in Russian).
22. Tolochek V. A. Fenomen «resursy»: stadii i situatsii aktualizatsii usloviy sredy kak resursov [“Resources” Phenomenon: Stages and Situations of Actualization of Environmental Conditions as Resources]. Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 2017, vol. 6, iss. 1 (21), pp. 15–22 (in Russian).
23. Gusel’tseva M. S. Printsip razvitiya v psikhologii: vyzovy poliparadigmal’nosti i transdistsiplinarnosti [Principle of Development in Psychology: Challenges of Poly-Paradygmality and Trans-Disciplinarity]. In: Printsip razvitiya v sovremennoy psikhologii [Principle of Development in Modern Psychology]. Eds. A. L. Zhu- ravlev, E. A. Sergienko. Moscow, 2016, pp. 31–51 (in Russian).
24. Martsinkovskaya T. D. Printsip razvitiya v diskurse personologicheskoy i vozrastnoy psikhologii [Principles of Development in Discourse of Personology and Age Psychology]. In: Printsip razvitiya v sovremennoy psikhologii [Principle of Development in Modern Psychology]. Eds. A. L. Zhuravlev, E. A. Sergienko. Moscow, 2016, pp. 116–134 (in Russian).